Literature DB >> 16323011

The euchromatic 9p+ polymorphism is a locus-specific amplification caused by repeated copies of a small DNA segment mapping within 9p12.

Rosetta Lecce1, Marina Murdolo, Gianfranco Gelli, Katharina Steindl, Livia Coppola, Anna Romano, Elisa Cupelli, Giovanni Neri, Marcella Zollino.   

Abstract

A large duplication involving the proximal euchromatic region of chromosome 9p was detected by conventional cytogenetics in a healthy 33-year-old woman and in two unrelated foetuses; both of them received the rearrangement from their healthy father. The duplicated segment was R(RBG) and C(CBG)-negative and G(GTG)-positive and was also positive for a 9-specific painting probe. It was preliminarily interpreted as a pathological quantitative change of the genome in the foetuses. FISH analyses allowed us to characterise the chromosome boundaries of this polymorphism, being identified by the RP11-15E1 BAC clone, proximally, and by the RP11-402N8 clone, distally, both probes falling within the 9p12 region. The contiguous, distally, RP11-916H19 probe was not included in the amplification, and may represent the discriminating genetic locus between chromosome polymorphism and chromosome mutation. The 9p12 amplification was approximately 12, 7 and 8 Mb in the three different families and was stable through generations. Our observations confirm the already provided evidence that proximal 9p duplications represent a benign euchromatic polymorphism. However, we demonstrated that these variants are not a simple duplication of the region 9p11.2-p13.1, as already suggested, but that they result from a many-fold amplification of a segment mapping within 9p12. These results provide important insights both in the genetic counselling and in the prenatal diagnosis of rare euchromatic chromosome variants and in understanding the architecture of the human genome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16323011     DOI: 10.1007/s00439-005-0085-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Genet        ISSN: 0340-6717            Impact factor:   4.132


  22 in total

Review 1.  Genome architecture, rearrangements and genomic disorders.

Authors:  Paweł Stankiewicz; James R Lupski
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 11.639

Review 2.  Recent duplication, domain accretion and the dynamic mutation of the human genome.

Authors:  E E Eichler
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 11.639

Review 3.  Amplification of a pseudogene cassette underlies euchromatic variation of 16p at the cytogenetic level.

Authors:  J C Barber; C J Reed; S P Dahoun; C A Joyce
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.132

4.  High-resolution mapping of human chromosome 11 by in situ hybridization with cosmid clones.

Authors:  P Lichter; C J Tang; K Call; G Hermanson; G A Evans; D Housman; D C Ward
Journal:  Science       Date:  1990-01-05       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Non C-banding variants in some normal families might be homogeneously staining regions.

Authors:  G C Webb; E J Krumins; S Z Eichenbaum; L E Voullaire; E Earle; K H Choó
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 4.132

6.  A rare non-heterochromatic 9p+ variant in two amniotic fluid cell cultures.

Authors:  N Archidiacono; V Pecile; M Rocchi; L Dalpra; G Nocera; G Simoni
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  1984 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.050

7.  Two unusual G-band variants of the short arm of chromosome 9.

Authors:  G R Sutherland; H Eyre
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 4.438

8.  Inherited interstitial duplications of proximal 15q: genotype-phenotype correlations.

Authors:  C E Browne; N R Dennis; E Maher; F L Long; J C Nicholson; J Sillibourne; J C Barber
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  Organisation of the pericentromeric region of chromosome 15: at least four partial gene copies are amplified in patients with a proximal duplication of 15q.

Authors:  J A Fantes; S K Mewborn; C M Lese; J Hedrick; R L Brown; V Dyomin; R S K Chaganti; S L Christian; D H Ledbetter
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 6.318

Review 10.  Genomic disorders: structural features of the genome can lead to DNA rearrangements and human disease traits.

Authors:  J R Lupski
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 11.639

View more
  5 in total

1.  De Novo Duplication of Chromosome 9p in a Female Infant: Phenotype and Genotype Correlation.

Authors:  Paola E Leone; Andy Pérez-Villa; Verónica Yumiceba; María Ángeles Hernández; Jennyfer M García-Cárdenas; Isaac Armendáriz-Castillo; Santiago Guerrero; Patricia Guevara-Ramírez; Andrés López-Cortés; Ana Karina Zambrano; Juan Luis García; Jesús María Hernández; César Paz-Y-Miño
Journal:  J Pediatr Genet       Date:  2019-09-16

2.  Heteromorphic variants of chromosome 9.

Authors:  Nadezda Kosyakova; Ani Grigorian; Thomas Liehr; Marina Manvelyan; Isabella Simonyan; Hasmik Mkrtchyan; Rouben Aroutiounian; Anna D Polityko; Anna I Kulpanovich; Tatiana Egorova; Evgenia Jaroshevich; Alla Frolova; Natalia Shorokh; Irina V Naumchik; Marianne Volleth; Isolde Schreyer; Heike Nelle; Markus Stumm; Rolf-Dieter Wegner; Gisela Reising-Ackermann; Martina Merkas; Lukretija Brecevic; Thomas Martin; Laura Rodríguez; Samarth Bhatt; Monika Ziegler; Katharina Kreskowski; Anja Weise; Ali Sazci; Svetlana Vorsanova; Marcelo de Bello Cioffi; Emel Ergul
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2013-04-01       Impact factor: 2.009

3.  Accurate, high-throughput typing of copy number variation using paralogue ratios from dispersed repeats.

Authors:  John A L Armour; Raquel Palla; Patrick L J M Zeeuwen; Martin den Heijer; Joost Schalkwijk; Edward J Hollox
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2006-12-14       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  Expansion of a 12-kb VNTR containing the REXO1L1 gene cluster underlies the microscopically visible euchromatic variant of 8q21.2.

Authors:  Christine Tyson; Andrew J Sharp; Monica Hrynchak; Siu L Yong; Edward J Hollox; Peter Warburton; John Ck Barber
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 4.246

5.  Chromosomal microarray analysis as the first-tier test for the identification of pathogenic copy number variants in chromosome 9 pericentric regions and its challenge.

Authors:  Jia-Chi Wang; Fatih Z Boyar
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 2.009

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.