Literature DB >> 16322615

Aspiration of osteoprogenitor cells for augmenting spinal fusion: comparison of progenitor cell concentrations from the vertebral body and iliac crest.

Robert F McLain1, James E Fleming, Cynthia A Boehm, George F Muschler.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Successful arthrodesis in challenging clinical scenarios is facilitated when the site is augmented with autograft bone. The iliac crest has long been the preferred source of autograft material, but graft harvest is associated with frequent complications and pain. Connective tissue progenitor cells aspirated from the iliac crest and concentrated with allograft matrix and demineralized bone matrix provide a promising alternative to traditional autograft harvest. The vertebral body, an even larger reservoir of myeloproliferative cells, should provide progenitor cell concentrations similar to those of the iliac crest.
METHODS: Twenty-one adults (eleven men and ten women with a mean age of 59 +/- 14 years) undergoing posterior lumbar arthrodesis and pedicle screw instrumentation underwent transpedicular aspiration of connective tissue progenitor cells. Aspirates were obtained from two depths within the vertebral body and were quantified relative to matched, bilateral aspirates from the iliac crest that were obtained from the same patient at the same time. Histochemical analysis was used to determine the prevalence of vertebral progenitor cells relative to the depth of aspiration, the vertebral level, age, and gender, as compared with the iliac crest standard. The cell count, progenitor cell concentration (cells/cc marrow), and progenitor cell prevalence (cells/million cells) were calculated.
RESULTS: Aspirates of vertebral marrow demonstrated comparable or greater concentrations of progenitor cells compared with matched controls from the iliac crest. Progenitor cell concentrations were consistently higher than matched controls from the iliac crest (p = 0.05). The concentration of osteogenic progenitor cells was, on the average, 71% higher in the vertebral aspirates than in the paired iliac crest samples (p = 0.05). With the numbers available, there were no significant differences relative to vertebral body level, the side aspirated, the depth of aspiration, or gender. An age-related decline in cellularity was suggested for the iliac crest aspirates.
CONCLUSIONS: The vertebral body is a suitable site for aspiration of bone marrow for graft augmentation during spinal arthrodesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16322615      PMCID: PMC1424877          DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.E.00230

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   6.558


  18 in total

1.  Spine fusion using cell matrix composites enriched in bone marrow-derived cells.

Authors:  George F Muschler; Hironori Nitto; Yoichi Matsukura; Cynthia Boehm; Antonio Valdevit; Helen Kambic; William Davros; Kimerly Powell; Kirk Easley
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Autologous marrow injection as a substitute for operative grafting of tibial nonunions.

Authors:  J F Connolly; R Guse; J Tiedeman; R Dehne
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Scoliosis surgery in adults.

Authors:  J P Kostuik; J Israel; J E Hall
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1973-06       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  In situ localization of PTH/PTHrP receptor mRNA in the bone of fetal and young rats.

Authors:  K Lee; J D Deeds; A T Bond; H Jüppner; A B Abou-Samra; G V Segre
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1993 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.398

5.  Aspiration to obtain osteoblast progenitor cells from human bone marrow: the influence of aspiration volume.

Authors:  G F Muschler; C Boehm; K Easley
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Morbidity at bone graft donor sites.

Authors:  E M Younger; M W Chapman
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.512

7.  Surgical treatment of paralytic scoliosis associated with myelomeningocele.

Authors:  W R Osebold; J K Mayfield; R B Winter; J H Moe
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Adult idiopathic scoliosis treated by posterior spinal fusion and Harrington instrumentation.

Authors:  B E van Dam; D S Bradford; J E Lonstein; J H Moe; J W Ogilvie; R B Winter
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1987 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Effects of donor age on osteogenic cells of rat bone marrow in vitro.

Authors:  T Tsuji; F J Hughes; C A McCulloch; A H Melcher
Journal:  Mech Ageing Dev       Date:  1990-02-01       Impact factor: 5.432

10.  Severe spine deformity in myelodysplasia and sacral agenesis: an aggressive surgical approach.

Authors:  J K Mayfield
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1981 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  42 in total

Review 1.  [Bone substitutes in scoliosis surgery].

Authors:  T Lerner; H Griefingholt; U Liljenqvist
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Biological properties of mesenchymal Stem Cells from different sources.

Authors:  Alessio Giai Via; Antonio Frizziero; Francesco Oliva
Journal:  Muscles Ligaments Tendons J       Date:  2012-10-16

3.  Hematopoietic stem cell and mesenchymal stem cell population size in bone marrow samples depends on patient's age and harvesting technique.

Authors:  Katja Rebolj; Matija Veber; Matej Drobnič; Elvira Maličev
Journal:  Cytotechnology       Date:  2018-09-18       Impact factor: 2.058

4.  Ability of bone graft substitutes to support the osteoprogenitor cells: An in-vitro study.

Authors:  Ziad Dahabreh; Michalis Panteli; Ippokratis Pountos; Mark Howard; Peter Campbell; Peter V Giannoudis
Journal:  World J Stem Cells       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 5.326

Review 5.  Intraoperative stem cell therapy.

Authors:  Mónica Beato Coelho; Joaquim M S Cabral; Jeffrey M Karp
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 9.590

6.  Cell-based approaches for augmentation of tendon repair.

Authors:  Camila B Carballo; Amir Lebaschi; Scott A Rodeo
Journal:  Tech Shoulder Elb Surg       Date:  2017-09-01

7.  Assessment of Multipotent Mesenchymal Stromal Cells in Bone Marrow Aspirate From Human Calcaneus.

Authors:  Chunmei Li; Cory D Kilpatrick; Shannon Smith; Dean L Glettig; Douglas J Glod; Jason Mallette; Michael R Strunk; Jerry Chang; Siddhesh R Angle; David L Kaplan
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Surg       Date:  2017 Jan - Feb       Impact factor: 1.286

8.  Variation in primary and culture-expanded cells derived from connective tissue progenitors in human bone marrow space, bone trabecular surface and adipose tissue.

Authors:  Maha A Qadan; Nicolas S Piuzzi; Cynthia Boehm; Wesley Bova; Malcolm Moos; Ronald J Midura; Vincent C Hascall; Christopher Malcuit; George F Muschler
Journal:  Cytotherapy       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 5.414

Review 9.  Advances in biologic augmentation for rotator cuff repair.

Authors:  Sahishnu Patel; Anthony P Gualtieri; Helen H Lu; William N Levine
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 5.691

10.  Effect of bone marrow cell collection techniques and donor site locations on in-vitro growth of bone forming cells.

Authors:  Sung Min Chung; Eun-Bok Kim; So-Young Park; Min Chul Sung; Hyun Kook Youn; Myun-Whan Ahn
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2008-12-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.