PURPOSE: To establish a comprehensive proteomic approach for biomarker discovery and validation in breast fluid. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: A total of 95 specimens from three institutions were used including 10 nipple aspiration fluid (5 stage I/II cancerous breasts and 5 age-matched healthy controls), 42 ductal lavage fluid from 14 patients with unilateral stage I/II cancer (25 from 9 cancerous breasts and 17 from 7 contralateral breasts), and 42 ductal lavage fluid from 14 high-risk women (multiple ducts repeated lavage). Differentially expressed protein/peptides were discovered by proteomic analysis of training sample, using ProteinChip arrays and surface-enhanced laser desorption ionization (SELDI) time-of-flight mass spectrometry, and validated on independently collected testing samples. After protein identification, ELISA was done to confirm the SELDI findings. RESULTS: We were able to obtain reproducible protein profiles using minimal amount of protein (1 mug) by applying an optimized chip protocol and SELDI. We were able to select cancer-associated biomarkers despite large individual variability by applying both unsupervised and supervised cluster analysis. Furthermore, we were able to train and test candidate biomarkers on independently collected samples and identified one component of a multimarker panel as human neutrophil peptides 1 to 3. CONCLUSIONS: Breast fluid is a rich source of breast cancer biomarkers. In combination with high-throughput novel proteomic profiling technology and multicenter study design, markers that are highly specific to breast cancer can be discovered and validated. Our observations also suggest that persistent elevation of human neutrophil peptide in high-risk women may imply early onset of cancer not yet detectable by current detection method. Proof of this hypothesis requires follow-up on a larger study population.
PURPOSE: To establish a comprehensive proteomic approach for biomarker discovery and validation in breast fluid. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: A total of 95 specimens from three institutions were used including 10 nipple aspiration fluid (5 stage I/II cancerous breasts and 5 age-matched healthy controls), 42 ductal lavage fluid from 14 patients with unilateral stage I/II cancer (25 from 9 cancerous breasts and 17 from 7 contralateral breasts), and 42 ductal lavage fluid from 14 high-risk women (multiple ducts repeated lavage). Differentially expressed protein/peptides were discovered by proteomic analysis of training sample, using ProteinChip arrays and surface-enhanced laser desorption ionization (SELDI) time-of-flight mass spectrometry, and validated on independently collected testing samples. After protein identification, ELISA was done to confirm the SELDI findings. RESULTS: We were able to obtain reproducible protein profiles using minimal amount of protein (1 mug) by applying an optimized chip protocol and SELDI. We were able to select cancer-associated biomarkers despite large individual variability by applying both unsupervised and supervised cluster analysis. Furthermore, we were able to train and test candidate biomarkers on independently collected samples and identified one component of a multimarker panel as human neutrophil peptides 1 to 3. CONCLUSIONS: Breast fluid is a rich source of breast cancer biomarkers. In combination with high-throughput novel proteomic profiling technology and multicenter study design, markers that are highly specific to breast cancer can be discovered and validated. Our observations also suggest that persistent elevation of human neutrophil peptide in high-risk women may imply early onset of cancer not yet detectable by current detection method. Proof of this hypothesis requires follow-up on a larger study population.
Authors: Baogang J Xu; Wenwei Yan; Bojana Jovanovic; Aubie K Shaw; Qi A An; Jimmy Eng; Anna Chytil; Andrew J Link; Harold L Moses Journal: Cancer Microenviron Date: 2010-04-13
Authors: Ali Shidfar; Tolulope Fatokun; David Ivancic; Robert T Chatterton; Seema A Khan; Jun Wang Journal: Horm Cancer Date: 2016-04-19 Impact factor: 3.869
Authors: Lei Zhang; Hua Xiao; Scott Karlan; Hui Zhou; Jenny Gross; David Elashoff; David Akin; Xinmin Yan; David Chia; Beth Karlan; David T Wong Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-12-31 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Andrea Maggrah; Kerry Robinson; Jennifer Creed; Roy Wittock; Ken Gehman; Teresa Gehman; Helen Brown; Andrew Harbottle; M Kent Froberg; Daniel Klein; Brian Reguly; Ryan Parr Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2012-12-26 Impact factor: 3.411