Literature DB >> 16321637

Accuracy and repeatability of a new method for measuring facet loads in the lumbar spine.

Derek C Wilson1, Christina A Niosi, Qingan A Zhu, Thomas R Oxland, David R Wilson.   

Abstract

We assessed the repeatability and accuracy of a relatively new, resistance-based sensor (Tekscan 6900) for measuring lumbar spine facet loads, pressures, and contact areas in cadaver specimens. Repeatability of measurements in the natural facet joint was determined for five trials of four specimens loaded in pure moment (+/- 7.5 N m) flexibility tests in axial rotation and flexion-extension. Accuracy of load measurements in four joints was assessed by applying known compressive loads of 25, 50, and 100 N to the natural facet joint in a materials testing machine and comparing the known applied load to the measured load. Measurements of load were obtained using two different calibration approaches: linear and two-point calibrations. Repeatability for force, pressure, and area (average of standard deviation as a percentage of the mean for all trials over all specimens) was 4-6% for axial rotation and 7-10% for extension. Peak resultant force in axial rotation was 30% smaller when calculated using the linear calibration method. The Tekscan sensor overestimated the applied force by 18 +/- 9% (mean+/-standard deviation), 35 +/- 7% and 50 +/- 9% for compressive loads of 100, 50, and 25 N, respectively. The two-point method overestimated the loads by 35 +/- 16%, 45 +/- 7%, and 56 +/- 10% for the same three loads. Our results show that the Tekscan sensor is repeatable. However, the sensor measurement range is not optimal for the small loads transmitted by the facets and measurement accuracy is highly dependent on calibration protocol.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16321637     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.12.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  21 in total

1.  MRI-based modeling for radiocarpal joint mechanics: validation criteria and results for four specimen-specific models.

Authors:  Kenneth J Fischer; Joshua E Johnson; Alexander J Waller; Terence E McIff; E Bruce Toby; Mehmet Bilgen
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  The effects of lumbar facet dowels on joint stiffness: a biomechanical study.

Authors:  Jayme Trahan; Eric Morales; Erich O Richter; Gabriel C Tender
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2014

3.  Parameters influencing the outcome after total disc replacement at the lumbosacral junction. Part 1: misalignment of the vertebrae adjacent to a total disc replacement affects the facet joint and facet capsule forces in a probabilistic finite element analysis.

Authors:  A Rohlmann; S Lauterborn; M Dreischarf; H Schmidt; M Putzier; P Strube; T Zander
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-07-20       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  In silico evaluation of a new composite disc substitute with a L3-L5 lumbar spine finite element model.

Authors:  Jérôme Noailly; Luigi Ambrosio; K Elizabeth Tanner; Josep A Planell; Damien Lacroix
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-03-05       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Increased patellofemoral pressure after TKA: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Ulf G Leichtle; Markus Wünschel; Carmen I Leichtle; Otto Müller; Philipp Kohler; Nikolaus Wülker; Andrea Lorenz
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Effect of multilevel lumbar disc arthroplasty on spine kinematics and facet joint loads in flexion and extension: a finite element analysis.

Authors:  Hendrik Schmidt; Fabio Galbusera; Antonius Rohlmann; Thomas Zander; Hans-Joachim Wilke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-04-02       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 7.  Spinal facet joint biomechanics and mechanotransduction in normal, injury and degenerative conditions.

Authors:  Nicolas V Jaumard; William C Welch; Beth A Winkelstein
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 2.097

8.  Finite element analysis for comparison of spinous process osteotomies technique with conventional laminectomy as lumbar decompression procedure.

Authors:  Ho-Joong Kim; Heoung-Jae Chun; Kyoung-Tak Kang; Hwan-Mo Lee; Bong-Soon Chang; Choon-Ki Lee; Jin-S Yeom
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.759

Review 9.  Role of biomechanics in intervertebral disc degeneration and regenerative therapies: what needs repairing in the disc and what are promising biomaterials for its repair?

Authors:  James C Iatridis; Steven B Nicoll; Arthur J Michalek; Benjamin A Walter; Michelle S Gupta
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 4.166

10.  TELD with limited foraminoplasty has potential biomechanical advantages over TELD with large annuloplasty: an in-silico study.

Authors:  Jingchi Li; Chen Xu; Xiaoyu Zhang; Zhipeng Xi; Mengnan Liu; Zhongxin Fang; Nan Wang; Lin Xie; Yueming Song
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-07-10       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.