Literature DB >> 16319565

Does the Orebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire predict outcomes following a work-related compensable injury?

Debra A Dunstan1, Tanya Covic, Graham A Tyson, Ian G Lennie.   

Abstract

The objective of this prospective study was to investigate the usefulness of the Orebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire (OMPQ) to predict return to work outcomes following a compensable musculoskeletal injury. Participants (n=196 injured workers, 66% male, 36% with back pain) were screened at 4-12 weeks, and followed up at 6 months, post-injury. Total scores on the OMPQ were able to differentiate between work status on both occasions, indicating the potential predictive validity of this instrument. This is the first study to evaluate the OMPQ in a compensable injury population, and although replication with a larger sample is required, the findings have significant relevance to the recommendation of routine screening for the early identification of injured workers at risk of long-term disability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16319565     DOI: 10.1097/00004356-200512000-00012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Rehabil Res        ISSN: 0342-5282            Impact factor:   1.479


  9 in total

1.  Problematic pain - redefining how we view pain?

Authors:  Chris Barker; Ann Taylor; Martin Johnson
Journal:  Br J Pain       Date:  2014-02

2.  Absenteeism screening questionnaire (ASQ): a new tool for predicting long-term absenteeism among workers with low back pain.

Authors:  Manon Truchon; Marie-Ève Schmouth; Denis Côté; Lise Fillion; Michel Rossignol; Marie-José Durand
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2012-03

3.  Psychosocial Factors Impacting Workplace Injury Rehabilitation: Evaluation of a Concise Screening Tool.

Authors:  Sareen McLinton; Sarven Savia McLinton; Martin van der Linden
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2018-03

Review 4.  Predictive value of the Acute Low Back Pain Screening Questionnaire and the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire for persisting problems.

Authors:  Martin Sattelmayer; Tobias Lorenz; Christoph Röder; Roger Hilfiker
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-07-26       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Predictive ability of a modified Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire in an acute/subacute low back pain working population.

Authors:  Charles Philip Gabel; Markus Melloh; Michael Yelland; Brendan Burkett; Anne Roiko
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-07-15       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  A review and critique of assessment instruments for patients with persistent pain.

Authors:  Karen Grimmer-Somers; Nic Vipond; Saravana Kumar; Gillian Hall
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 3.133

7.  Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Validity, and Reliability of the Persian Version of the Orebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire.

Authors:  Asrin Shafeei; Hamid Reza Mokhtarinia; Azam Maleki-Ghahfarokhi; Leila Piri
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2017-08-07

Review 8.  Multidimensional screening for predicting pain problems in adults: a systematic review of screening tools and validation studies.

Authors:  Elke Veirman; Dimitri M L Van Ryckeghem; Annick De Paepe; Olivia J Kirtley; Geert Crombez
Journal:  Pain Rep       Date:  2019-09-11

9.  Subgrouping low back pain: a comparison of the STarT Back Tool with the Orebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire.

Authors:  Jonathan C Hill; Kate M Dunn; Chris J Main; Elaine M Hay
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2009-02-18       Impact factor: 3.931

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.