OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to: (1) investigate patients' views on euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide (PAS), and (2) examine the impact of question wording and patients' own definitions on their responses. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey of consecutive patients with cancer. SETTING: Newcastle (Australia) Mater Hospital Outpatients Clinic. PARTICIPANTS: Patients over 18 years of age, attending the clinic for follow-up consultation or treatment by a medical oncologist, radiation oncologist or haematologist. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Face-to-face patient interviews were conducted examining attitudes to euthanasia and PAS. RESULTS: 236 patients with cancer (24% participation rate; 87% consent rate) were interviewed. Though the majority of participants supported the idea of euthanasia, patient views varied significantly according to question wording and their own understanding of the definition of euthanasia. CONCLUSIONS: Researchers need to be circumspect about framing and interpreting questions about support of 'euthanasia', as the term can mean different things to different people, and response may depend upon the specifics of the question asked.
OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to: (1) investigate patients' views on euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide (PAS), and (2) examine the impact of question wording and patients' own definitions on their responses. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey of consecutive patients with cancer. SETTING: Newcastle (Australia) Mater Hospital Outpatients Clinic. PARTICIPANTS: Patients over 18 years of age, attending the clinic for follow-up consultation or treatment by a medical oncologist, radiation oncologist or haematologist. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Face-to-face patient interviews were conducted examining attitudes to euthanasia and PAS. RESULTS: 236 patients with cancer (24% participation rate; 87% consent rate) were interviewed. Though the majority of participants supported the idea of euthanasia, patient views varied significantly according to question wording and their own understanding of the definition of euthanasia. CONCLUSIONS: Researchers need to be circumspect about framing and interpreting questions about support of 'euthanasia', as the term can mean different things to different people, and response may depend upon the specifics of the question asked.
Entities:
Keywords:
Death and Euthanasia; Empirical Approach
Authors: Nathan E Goldstein; Lewis M Cohen; Robert M Arnold; Elizabeth Goy; Stephen Arons; Linda Ganzini Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2012-03 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Farr A Curlin; Chinyere Nwodim; Jennifer L Vance; Marshall H Chin; John D Lantos Journal: Am J Hosp Palliat Care Date: 2008-01-15 Impact factor: 2.500