Literature DB >> 16317203

Tobacco industry influence on science and scientists in Germany.

Thilo Grüning1, Anna B Gilmore, Martin McKee.   

Abstract

Using tobacco industry documents, we examined how and why the tobacco industry sought to influence science and scientists in Germany as a possible factor in explaining the German opposition to stricter tobacco regulation. Smoking and health research programs were organized both separately by individual tobacco companies and jointly through their German trade organization. An extensive network of scientists and scientific institutions with tobacco industry links was developed. Science was distorted in 5 ways: suppression, dilution, distraction, concealment, and manipulation. The extent of tobacco industry influence over the scientific establishment in Germany is profound. The industry introduced serious bias that probably influenced scientific and public opinion in Germany. This influence likely undermined efforts to control tobacco use.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16317203      PMCID: PMC1470431          DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.061507

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  25 in total

1.  Shameful science: four decades of the German tobacco industry's hidden research on smoking and health.

Authors:  N Hirschhorn
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 7.552

2.  The ethics of the cash register: taking tobacco research dollars.

Authors:  S Chapman; S Shatenstein
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 7.552

3.  Why journals should not publish articles funded by the tobacco industry.

Authors:  J King; G Yamey
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-10-28

Review 4.  "Operation Berkshire": the international tobacco companies' conspiracy.

Authors:  N Francey; S Chapman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-08-05

5.  Germany: tobacco industry paradise.

Authors:  M Poetschke-Langer; S Schunk
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 7.552

6.  Tobacco industry documents: treasure trove or quagmire?

Authors:  R E Malone; E D Balbach
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 7.552

7.  Tobacco industry efforts at discrediting scientific knowledge of environmental tobacco smoke: a review of internal industry documents.

Authors:  J Drope; S Chapman
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.710

8.  Industry-funded research and conflict of interest: an analysis of research sponsored by the tobacco industry through the Center for Indoor Air Research.

Authors:  D E Barnes; L A Bero
Journal:  J Health Polit Policy Law       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.265

Review 9.  Tobacco industry strategies for influencing European Community tobacco advertising legislation.

Authors:  Mark Neuman; Asaf Bitton; Stanton Glantz
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-04-13       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Tobacco industry documents: comparing the Minnesota Depository and internet access.

Authors:  E D Balbach; R J Gasior; E M Barbeau
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 7.552

View more
  30 in total

1.  The "father of stress" meets "big tobacco": Hans Selye and the tobacco industry.

Authors:  Mark P Petticrew; Kelley Lee
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Independent research on tobacco control in Germany.

Authors:  Alexander Krämer
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-05-02       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  German tobacco industry's successful efforts to maintain scientific and political respectability to prevent regulation of secondhand smoke.

Authors:  A Bornhäuser; J McCarthy; S A Glantz
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 7.552

4.  Exposure to smoking in popular contemporary movies and youth smoking in Germany.

Authors:  Reiner Hanewinkel; James D Sargent
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 5.  Evidence Regarding the Impact of Conflicts of Interest on Environmental and Occupational Health Research.

Authors:  Ellen M Wells
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2017-06

6.  Type A behavior pattern and coronary heart disease: Philip Morris's "crown jewel".

Authors:  Mark P Petticrew; Kelley Lee; Martin McKee
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2012-09-20       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 7.  The vector of the tobacco epidemic: tobacco industry practices in low and middle-income countries.

Authors:  Sungkyu Lee; Pamela M Ling; Stanton A Glantz
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 2.506

8.  Recommendations for the Appropriate Structure, Communication, and Investigation of Tobacco Harm Reduction Claims. An Official American Thoracic Society Policy Statement.

Authors:  Frank T Leone; Kai-Håkon Carlsen; David Chooljian; Laura E Crotty Alexander; Frank C Detterbeck; Michelle N Eakin; Sarah Evers-Casey; Harold J Farber; Patricia Folan; Hasmeena Kathuria; Karen Latzka; Shane McDermott; Sharon McGrath-Morrow; Farzad Moazed; Alfred Munzer; Enid Neptune; Smita Pakhale; David P L Sachs; Jonathan Samet; Beth Sufian; Dona Upson
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 21.405

Review 9.  What is known about tobacco industry efforts to influence tobacco tax? A systematic review of empirical studies.

Authors:  Katherine E Smith; Emily Savell; Anna B Gilmore
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2012-08-12       Impact factor: 7.552

10.  Civil society and the negotiation of the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control.

Authors:  H M Mamudu; S A Glantz
Journal:  Glob Public Health       Date:  2009
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.