Literature DB >> 16313606

Detection of secondary predation by PCR analyses of the gut contents of invertebrate generalist predators.

S K Sheppard1, J Bell, K D Sunderland, J Fenlon, D Skervin, W O C Symondson.   

Abstract

Predation by generalist predators is difficult to study in the field because of the complex effects of positive and negative interactions within and between predator species and guilds. Predation can be monitored by molecular means, through identification of prey DNA within predators. However, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification of prey DNA from predators cannot discriminate between primary and secondary predation (hyperpredation), in which one predator feeds on another that has recently eaten the target prey. Here we quantify, for the first time, the potential error caused by detection of prey DNA following secondary predation, using an aphid-spider-carabid model. First, the aphid Sitobion avenae was fed to the spider Tenuiphantes tenuis and the carabid Pterostichus melanarius, and the postconsumption detection periods, for prey DNA within predators, were calculated. Aphids were then fed to spiders and the spiders to carabids. Aphid DNA was detected in the predators using primers that amplified 245- and 110-bp fragments of the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I gene. Fragment size and predator sex had no significant effect on detection periods. Secondary predation could be detected for up to 8 h, when carabids fed on spiders immediately after the latter had consumed aphids. Beetles tested positive up to 4 h after eating spiders that had digested their aphid prey for 4 h. Clearly, the extreme sensitivity of PCR makes detection of secondary predation more likely, and the only reliable answer in future may be to use PCR to identify, in parallel, instances of intraguild predation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16313606     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02742.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol        ISSN: 0962-1083            Impact factor:   6.185


  38 in total

1.  Diagnostic PCR can be used to illuminate meiofaunal diets and trophic relationships.

Authors:  Hanna Maghsoud; Austin Weiss; Julian P S Smith; Marian K Litvaitis; Stephen R Fegley
Journal:  Invertebr Biol       Date:  2014-06-01       Impact factor: 1.250

2.  Identifying the predator complex of Homalodisca vitripennis (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae): a comparative study of the efficacy of an ELISA and PCR gut content assay.

Authors:  Valerie Fournier; James Hagler; Kent Daane; Jesse de León; Russell Groves
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2008-07-10       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  TaqMan REAL-Time PCR-based approach for differentiation between Globodera rostochiensis (golden nematode) and Globodera artemisiae species.

Authors:  Katarzyna Nowaczyk; Renata Dobosz; Stefan Kornobis; Aleksandra Obrepalska-Steplowska
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2008-05-16       Impact factor: 2.289

4.  A molecular approach to identifying the natural prey of the African creeping water bug Naucoris, a potential reservoir of Mycobacterium ulcerans.

Authors:  Maribet Gamboa; Ryan K Kimbirauskas; Richard W Merritt; Michael T Monaghan
Journal:  J Insect Sci       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.857

5.  Detecting ingested plant DNA in soil-living insect larvae.

Authors:  Karin Staudacher; Corinna Wallinger; Nikolaus Schallhart; Michael Traugott
Journal:  Soil Biol Biochem       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 7.609

6.  The ubiquity of intraguild predation among predatory arthropods.

Authors:  Annie-Ève Gagnon; George E Heimpel; Jacques Brodeur
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  An emerging infectious disease triggering large-scale hyperpredation.

Authors:  Marcos Moleón; Pablo Almaraz; José A Sánchez-Zapata
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-06-04       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Optimizing methods for PCR-based analysis of predation.

Authors:  Daniela Sint; Lorna Raso; Rüdiger Kaufmann; Michael Traugott
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 7.090

9.  Effectiveness of annealing blocking primers versus restriction enzymes for characterization of generalist diets: unexpected prey revealed in the gut contents of two coral reef fish species.

Authors:  Matthieu Leray; Natalia Agudelo; Suzanne C Mills; Christopher P Meyer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Detection of predation using qPCR: effect of prey quantity, elapsed time, chaser diet, and sample preservation on detectable quantity of prey DNA.

Authors:  Donald C Weber; Jonathan G Lundgren
Journal:  J Insect Sci       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.857

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.