BACKGROUND: Previous work on visual selective attention in Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) has utilised spatial search paradigms. This study compared ADHD to control children on a temporal search task using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation (RSVP). In addition, the effects of irrelevant singleton distractors on search performance were examined. METHOD: In each condition, subjects reported the identity of a red letter 'probe' in a sequence of white letters which appeared one after the other at a central fixation point. The temporal position of the probe varied from an initial target, which was distinguished by surrounding asterisks. The target was reported in addition to the probe in condition 2, but not in the baseline condition 1. In a third condition, the initial target was not reported, but one of the asterisks appeared as a colour singleton on some trials. RESULTS: All children displayed an 'attentional blink' with probe detection reduced when it appeared at close temporal relations relative to the target. This 'blink' reduced over time, and there were no group differences in the recovery of performance, although ADHD children made more errors overall. The ADHD group were also more vulnerable than controls to distraction from irrelevant singletons in condition 3. CONCLUSION: Although the basic mechanisms of selective attention were not impaired in children with ADHD, these children appeared to require more resources to execute the task and were more vulnerable to distraction by irrelevant singletons, indicating deficits in the maintenance of attentional control.
BACKGROUND: Previous work on visual selective attention in Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) has utilised spatial search paradigms. This study compared ADHD to control children on a temporal search task using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation (RSVP). In addition, the effects of irrelevant singleton distractors on search performance were examined. METHOD: In each condition, subjects reported the identity of a red letter 'probe' in a sequence of white letters which appeared one after the other at a central fixation point. The temporal position of the probe varied from an initial target, which was distinguished by surrounding asterisks. The target was reported in addition to the probe in condition 2, but not in the baseline condition 1. In a third condition, the initial target was not reported, but one of the asterisks appeared as a colour singleton on some trials. RESULTS: All children displayed an 'attentional blink' with probe detection reduced when it appeared at close temporal relations relative to the target. This 'blink' reduced over time, and there were no group differences in the recovery of performance, although ADHDchildren made more errors overall. The ADHD group were also more vulnerable than controls to distraction from irrelevant singletons in condition 3. CONCLUSION: Although the basic mechanisms of selective attention were not impaired in children with ADHD, these children appeared to require more resources to execute the task and were more vulnerable to distraction by irrelevant singletons, indicating deficits in the maintenance of attentional control.
Authors: Henrik Uebel; Björn Albrecht; Philip Asherson; Norbert A Börger; Louise Butler; Wai Chen; Hanna Christiansen; Alexander Heise; Jonna Kuntsi; Ulrike Schäfer; Penny Andreou; Iris Manor; Rafaela Marco; Ana Miranda; Aisling Mulligan; Robert D Oades; Jaap van der Meere; Stephen V Faraone; Aribert Rothenberger; Tobias Banaschewski Journal: J Child Psychol Psychiatry Date: 2009-11-19 Impact factor: 8.982
Authors: Stacia R Friedman-Hill; Meryl R Wagman; Saskia E Gex; Daniel S Pine; Ellen Leibenluft; Leslie G Ungerleider Journal: Cognition Date: 2010-01-21
Authors: Penny Andreou; Ben M Neale; Wai Chen; Hanna Christiansen; Isabel Gabriels; Alexander Heise; Sheera Meidad; Ueli C Muller; Henrik Uebel; Tobias Banaschewski; Iris Manor; Robert Oades; Herbert Roeyers; Aribert Rothenberger; Pak Sham; Hans-Christoph Steinhausen; Philip Asherson; Jonna Kuntsi Journal: Psychol Med Date: 2007-05-31 Impact factor: 7.723