BACKGROUND: Reaction time (RT) variability is one of the strongest findings to emerge in cognitive-experimental research of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). We set out to confirm the association between ADHD and slow and variable RTs and investigate the degree to which RT performance improves under fast event rate and incentives. Using a group familial correlation approach, we tested the hypothesis that there are shared familial effects on RT performance and ADHD. METHOD: A total of 144 ADHD combined-type probands, 125 siblings of the ADHD probands and 60 control participants, ages 6-18, performed a four-choice RT task with baseline and fast-incentive conditions. RESULTS: ADHD was associated with slow and variable RTs, and with greater improvement in speed and RT variability from baseline to fast-incentive condition. RT performance showed shared familial influences with ADHD. Under the assumption that the familial effects represent genetic influences, the proportion of the phenotypic correlation due to shared familial influences was estimated as 60-70%. CONCLUSIONS: The data are inconsistent with models that consider RT variability as reflecting a stable cognitive deficit in ADHD, but instead emphasize the extent to which energetic or motivational factors can have a greater effect on RT performance in ADHD. The findings support the role of RT variability as an endophenotype mediating the link between genes and ADHD.
BACKGROUND: Reaction time (RT) variability is one of the strongest findings to emerge in cognitive-experimental research of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). We set out to confirm the association between ADHD and slow and variable RTs and investigate the degree to which RT performance improves under fast event rate and incentives. Using a group familial correlation approach, we tested the hypothesis that there are shared familial effects on RT performance and ADHD. METHOD: A total of 144 ADHD combined-type probands, 125 siblings of the ADHD probands and 60 control participants, ages 6-18, performed a four-choice RT task with baseline and fast-incentive conditions. RESULTS: ADHD was associated with slow and variable RTs, and with greater improvement in speed and RT variability from baseline to fast-incentive condition. RT performance showed shared familial influences with ADHD. Under the assumption that the familial effects represent genetic influences, the proportion of the phenotypic correlation due to shared familial influences was estimated as 60-70%. CONCLUSIONS: The data are inconsistent with models that consider RT variability as reflecting a stable cognitive deficit in ADHD, but instead emphasize the extent to which energetic or motivational factors can have a greater effect on RT performance in ADHD. The findings support the role of RT variability as an endophenotype mediating the link between genes and ADHD.
Authors: Sandra K Loo; Elaine Specter; Andrew Smolen; Christian Hopfer; Peter D Teale; Martin L Reite Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2003-08 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: K Brookes; X Xu; W Chen; K Zhou; B Neale; N Lowe; R Anney; R Aneey; B Franke; M Gill; R Ebstein; J Buitelaar; P Sham; D Campbell; J Knight; P Andreou; M Altink; R Arnold; F Boer; C Buschgens; L Butler; H Christiansen; L Feldman; K Fleischman; E Fliers; R Howe-Forbes; A Goldfarb; A Heise; I Gabriëls; I Korn-Lubetzki; L Johansson; R Marco; S Medad; R Minderaa; F Mulas; U Müller; A Mulligan; K Rabin; N Rommelse; V Sethna; J Sorohan; H Uebel; L Psychogiou; A Weeks; R Barrett; I Craig; T Banaschewski; E Sonuga-Barke; J Eisenberg; J Kuntsi; I Manor; P McGuffin; A Miranda; R D Oades; R Plomin; H Roeyers; A Rothenberger; J Sergeant; H-C Steinhausen; E Taylor; M Thompson; S V Faraone; P Asherson Journal: Mol Psychiatry Date: 2006-08-08 Impact factor: 15.992
Authors: Yannis Paloyelis; Philip Asherson; Mitul A Mehta; Stephen V Faraone; Jonna Kuntsi Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2010-08-25 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Tomasz Schneider; Nicholas Ilott; Giovana Brolese; Lisiane Bizarro; Philip J E Asherson; Ian P Stolerman Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2011-02-02 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Daniel K Campbell-Meiklejohn; Arndis Simonsen; Mads Jensen; Victoria Wohlert; Trine Gjerløff; Jørgen Scheel-Kruger; Arne Møller; Chris D Frith; Andreas Roepstorff Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2012-02-08 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Jonna Kuntsi; Alexis C Wood; Frühling Rijsdijk; Katherine A Johnson; Penelope Andreou; Björn Albrecht; Alejandro Arias-Vasquez; Jan K Buitelaar; Gráinne McLoughlin; Nanda N J Rommelse; Joseph A Sergeant; Edmund J Sonuga-Barke; Henrik Uebel; Jaap J van der Meere; Tobias Banaschewski; Michael Gill; Iris Manor; Ana Miranda; Fernando Mulas; Robert D Oades; Herbert Roeyers; Aribert Rothenberger; Hans-Christoph Steinhausen; Stephen V Faraone; Philip Asherson Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2010-11
Authors: Matthew Ryan; Rebecca Martin; Martha B Denckla; Stewart H Mostofsky; E Mark Mahone Journal: J Int Neuropsychol Soc Date: 2009-12-11 Impact factor: 2.892