Literature DB >> 16313405

Influence of fermentation time, cryoprotectant and neutralization of cell concentrate on freeze-drying survival, storage stability, and acid and bile exposure of Bifidobacterium animalis ssp. lactis cells produced without milk-based ingredients.

M Saarela1, I Virkajärvi, H-L Alakomi, T Mattila-Sandholm, A Vaari, T Suomalainen, J Mättö.   

Abstract

AIMS: To investigate the stability of Bifidobacterium animalis ssp. lactis VTT E-012010 (=Bb-12) during freeze-drying, storage and acid and bile exposure. The effect of harvesting time and composition and pH of the cryoprotectant on the survival was evaluated. The procedure was performed by using a milk-free culture medium and cryoprotectants to produce cells for nonmilk-based applications. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Bifidobacterial cells were grown in fermenters in general edible medium for 15 or 22 h. The cell mass was freeze-dried either as non-neutralized or neutralized using sucrose, betaine or reconstituted skim milk (control) as cryoprotectants. For stability studies freeze-dried powders were stored at 37, 5 and -20 degrees C for 2-6 months. In addition, acid and bile tolerance of the powders was tested. Sucrose-formulated B. animalis ssp. lactis preparations had an excellent stability during storage at refrigerated and frozen temperatures for 5-6 months. They also had a good survival during storage at 37 degrees C for 2 months as well as during exposure to pH 3 and 1% bile acids. No difference was observed between 15 and 22 h grown cells or between non-neutralized and neutralized cells. Betaine proved to be a poor cryoprotectant compared with sucrose.
CONCLUSIONS: Fermentation time and neutralization of cell concentrate before freeze-drying had no impact on the storage stability and bile and acid tolerance of freeze-dried bifidobacterial cells. The nonmilk-based production protocol using sucrose as a cryoprotectant yielded powdery preparations with excellent stability in adverse conditions (storage at elevated temperatures and during acid and bile exposure). SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: The results indicate that it is feasible to develop nonmilk-based production technologies for probiotic cultures. This provides new possibilities for the development of nondairy-based probiotic products.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16313405     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2005.02742.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Microbiol        ISSN: 1364-5072            Impact factor:   3.772


  10 in total

1.  Guide to designing, conducting, publishing and communicating results of clinical studies involving probiotic applications in human participants.

Authors:  Andi L Shane; Michael D Cabana; Stéphane Vidry; Dan Merenstein; Ruben Hummelen; Collin L Ellis; James T Heimbach; Susanne Hempel; Susan V Lynch; Mary Ellen Sanders; Daniel J Tancredi
Journal:  Gut Microbes       Date:  2010-06-16

2.  Correlation Between the Amount of Extracellular Polymeric Substances and the Survival Rate to Freeze-Drying of Probiotics.

Authors:  Thi-Tho Nguyen; Phu-Tho Nguyen; Thi-Thuy-Vy Nguyen; Thi-To-Uyen Nguyen; Thi-Bich-Nhu Nguyen; Nhi-Binh Bui; Quoc-Khanh Hoang; Huu-Thanh Nguyen
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 2.188

3.  Cell viability of microencapsulated Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis under freeze-drying, storage and gastrointestinal tract simulation conditions.

Authors:  Fatemeh Shamekhi; Mustafa Shuhaimi; Arbakariya Ariff; Yazid A Manap
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2012-07-29       Impact factor: 2.099

4.  Pilot-scale production and viability analysis of freeze-dried probiotic bacteria using different protective agents.

Authors:  Michele Savini; Cinzia Cecchini; Maria Cristina Verdenelli; Stefania Silvi; Carla Orpianesi; Alberto Cresci
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2010-03-11       Impact factor: 5.717

5.  Bacillus subtilis natto: a non-toxic source of poly-γ-glutamic acid that could be used as a cryoprotectant for probiotic bacteria.

Authors:  Aditya R Bhat; Victor U Irorere; Terry Bartlett; David Hill; Gopal Kedia; Mark R Morris; Dimitris Charalampopoulos; Iza Radecka
Journal:  AMB Express       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 3.298

6.  Membrane fatty acid composition and fluidity are involved in the resistance to freezing of Lactobacillus buchneri R1102 and Bifidobacterium longum R0175.

Authors:  Séverine Louesdon; Séverine Charlot-Rougé; Raphaëlle Tourdot-Maréchal; Marielle Bouix; Catherine Béal
Journal:  Microb Biotechnol       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 5.813

Review 7.  Review: Adaptation of Beneficial Propionibacteria, Lactobacilli, and Bifidobacteria Improves Tolerance Toward Technological and Digestive Stresses.

Authors:  Floriane Gaucher; Sylvie Bonnassie; Houem Rabah; Pierre Marchand; Philippe Blanc; Romain Jeantet; Gwénaël Jan
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 8.  Assessing Viability and Stress Tolerance of Probiotics-A Review.

Authors:  Ulrika Wendel
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 5.640

9.  Cryoprotection of probiotic bacteria with poly-γ-glutamic acid produced by Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus licheniformis.

Authors:  Eman Zakaria Gomaa
Journal:  J Genet Eng Biotechnol       Date:  2016-11-07

10.  Impact of cultivation strategy, freeze-drying process, and storage conditions on survival, membrane integrity, and inactivation kinetics of Bifidobacterium longum.

Authors:  Regina Haindl; Alexandra Neumayr; Anika Frey; Ulrich Kulozik
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2020-08-27       Impact factor: 2.099

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.