Literature DB >> 16311765

Kinematic cues in perceptual weight judgement and their origins in box lifting.

A F de C Hamilton1, D W Joyce, J R Flanagan, C D Frith, D M Wolpert.   

Abstract

When accepting a parcel from another person, we are able to use information about that person's movement to estimate in advance the weight of the parcel, that is, to judge its weight from observed action. Perceptual weight judgment provides a powerful method to study our interpretation of other people's actions, but it is not known what sources of information are used in judging weight. We have manipulated full form videos to obtain precise control of the perceived kinematics of a box lifting action, and use this technique to explore the kinematic cues that affect weight judgment. We find that observers rely most on the duration of the lifting movement to judge weight, and make less use of the durations of the grasp phase, when the box is first gripped, or the place phase, when the box is put down. These findings can be compared to the kinematics of natural box lifting behaviour, where we find that the duration of the grasp component is the best predictor of true box weight. The lack of accord between the optimal cues predicted by the natural behaviour and the cues actually used in the perceptual task has implications for our understanding of action observation in terms of a motor simulation. The differences between perceptual and motor behaviour are evidence against a strong version of the motor simulation hypothesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16311765      PMCID: PMC2637436          DOI: 10.1007/s00426-005-0032-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  20 in total

1.  Neural mechanisms subserving the perception of human actions.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Action plans used in action observation.

Authors:  J Randall Flanagan; Roland S Johansson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-08-14       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 3.  The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning.

Authors:  B Hommel; J Müsseler; G Aschersleben; W Prinz
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 12.579

4.  Your own action influences how you perceive another person's action.

Authors:  Antonia Hamilton; Daniel Wolpert; Uta Frith
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2004-03-23       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  Inferring false beliefs from the actions of oneself and others: an fMRI study.

Authors:  J Grèzes; C D Frith; R E Passingham
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Visual size cues in the programming of manipulative forces during precision grip.

Authors:  A M Gordon; H Forssberg; R S Johansson; G Westling
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Kinematic form and scaling: further investigations on the visual perception of lifted weight.

Authors:  G P Bingham
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Kinematic features of unrestrained vertical arm movements.

Authors:  C G Atkeson; J M Hollerbach
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Mirror neurons and the simulation theory of mind-reading.

Authors:  V Gallese; A Goldman
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  1998-12-01       Impact factor: 20.229

10.  Localization of grasp representations in humans by positron emission tomography. 2. Observation compared with imagination.

Authors:  S T Grafton; M A Arbib; L Fadiga; G Rizzolatti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  27 in total

1.  Visual information gleaned by observing grasping movement in allocentric and egocentric perspectives.

Authors:  Francesco Campanella; Giulio Sandini; Maria Concetta Morrone
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Intentional control of attention: action planning primes action-related stimulus dimensions.

Authors:  Sabrina Fagioli; Bernhard Hommel; Ricarda Ines Schubotz
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2005-11-30

3.  The role of observers' gaze behaviour when watching object manipulation tasks: predicting and evaluating the consequences of action.

Authors:  J Randall Flanagan; Gerben Rotman; Andreas F Reichelt; Roland S Johansson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Effect of weight-related labels on corticospinal excitability during observation of grasping: a TMS study.

Authors:  Patrice Senot; Alessandro D'Ausilio; Michele Franca; Luana Caselli; Laila Craighero; Luciano Fadiga
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-03-29       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Observing how others lift light or heavy objects: time-dependent encoding of grip force in the primary motor cortex.

Authors:  Kaat Alaerts; Toon T de Beukelaar; Stephan P Swinnen; Nicole Wenderoth
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-09-20

6.  On interference effects in concurrent perception and action.

Authors:  Jan Zwickel; Marc Grosjean; Wolfgang Prinz
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2009-02-13

7.  Does Parkinson's disease affect judgement about another person's action?

Authors:  E Poliakoff; A J Galpin; J P R Dick; S P Tipper
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-08-19       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Adaptation of lift forces in object manipulation through action observation.

Authors:  Andreas F Reichelt; Alyssa M Ash; Lee A Baugh; Roland S Johansson; J Randall Flanagan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-05-17       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 9.  Intentional weighting: a basic principle in cognitive control.

Authors:  Jiska Memelink; Bernhard Hommel
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-04-12

10.  Imitation in autism: why action kinematics matter.

Authors:  Emma Gowen
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2012-12-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.