Literature DB >> 16311351

Frequent overexpression of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in mammary high grade ductal carcinomas with myoepithelial differentiation.

T Shien1, T Tashiro, M Omatsu, T Masuda, K Furuta, N Sato, S Akashi-Tanaka, M Uehara, E Iwamoto, T Kinoshita, T Fukutomi, H Tsuda, T Hasegawa.   

Abstract

AIMS: To evaluate the expression of common biological markers and the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in mammary high grade ductal carcinomas with myoepithelial differentiation (DCMDs). MATERIALS/
METHODS: Thirty DCMDs were clinicopathologically and immunohistochemically analysed and compared with 36 control cases of high grade conventional invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC).
RESULTS: EGFR, HER2/neu, oestrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and p53 expression was seen in 21, one, three, four, and 20 of the 30 DCMDs, compared with eight, nine, 18, 17, and five of the 36 conventional IDCs (p<0.05), respectively. In 16 of the 30 DCMDs, metastases were found in the brain, lung, bone, and liver, within a maximum of 47 months (mean, 13.9) after initial surgery, whereas only four of the 36 conventional IDCs metastasised to the lung and bone within a maximum of 27 months (mean, 18.0) after initial surgery (p=0.0001). There was a significant difference in disease free survival between DCMD and conventional IDC (p=0.001). EGFR was frequently overexpressed in DCMD compared with conventional IDC, whereas the expression of HER2/neu and hormone receptors was lower in DCMD. Fluorescent in situ hybridisation revealed that the mean EGFR to chromosome 7 centromere (CEP7) ratio of the 24 DCMD cases available for evaluation was 1.03, and EGFR gene amplification was not detected in the 21 DCMD cases with EGFR overexpression.
CONCLUSION: Immunohistochemistry for myoepithelial markers and EGFR is useful for the accurate diagnosis and molecular target treatment of high grade DCMD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16311351      PMCID: PMC1770787          DOI: 10.1136/jcp.2005.026096

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0021-9746            Impact factor:   3.411


  30 in total

1.  Molecular biomarkers for breast cancer prognosis: coexpression of c-erbB-2 and p53.

Authors:  S W Beenken; W E Grizzle; D R Crowe; M G Conner; H L Weiss; M T Sellers; H Krontiras; M M Urist; K I Bland
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  The role of HER2/neu overexpression/amplification in the progression of ductal carcinoma in situ to invasive carcinoma of the breast.

Authors:  E K Latta; S Tjan; R K Parkes; F P O'Malley
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 7.842

3.  Metaplastic breast carcinoma: pathology and clinical outcome.

Authors:  Roberto Bellino; Riccardo Arisio; Francesco D'Addato; Rossella Attini; Antonio Durando; Saverio Danese; Elena Bertone; Ruggero Grio; Marco Massobrio
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.480

4.  Myoepithelial differentiation in high-grade invasive ductal carcinomas with large central acellular zones.

Authors:  H Tsuda; T Takarabe; T Hasegawa; T Murata; S Hirohashi
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.466

5.  Metaplastic carcinomas of the breast.

Authors:  T C Chao; C S Wang; S C Chen; M F Chen
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.454

6.  Prognostic value of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and its relationship to the estrogen receptor status in 1029 patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Shinichi Tsutsui; Shinji Ohno; Shigeru Murakami; Yoichi Hachitanda; Shinya Oda
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  Differential amplification and overexpression of HER-2/neu, p53, MIB1, and estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor among medullary carcinoma, atypical medullary carcinoma, and high-grade invasive ductal carcinoma of breast.

Authors:  Ruliang Xu; Helen Feiner; Peng Li; Herman Yee; Giorgio Inghirami; Yara Delgado; Mary Ann Perle
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.534

8.  A mutant TP53 gene status is associated with a poor prognosis and anthracycline-resistance in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  E Rahko; G Blanco; Y Soini; R Bloigu; A Jukkola
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 9.162

9.  Assessment of HER-2/neu overexpression and/or gene amplification in breast carcinomas: should in situ hybridization be the method of choice?

Authors:  Torill Sauer; Gro Wiedswang; Ghania Boudjema; Hanne Christensen; Rolf Karesen
Journal:  APMIS       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.205

10.  CGH analysis of ductal carcinoma of the breast with basaloid/myoepithelial cell differentiation.

Authors:  C Jones; A V Nonni; L Fulford; S Merrett; R Chaggar; V Eusebi; S R Lakhani
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2001-08-03       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Triple-negative breast cancer: disease entity or title of convenience?

Authors:  Lisa Carey; Eric Winer; Giuseppe Viale; David Cameron; Luca Gianni
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 66.675

2.  Dramatic Response to Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, and Radiation in a Patient With Malignant Myoepithelioma of the Breast.

Authors:  Phu N Tran; Lefan Zhuang; Chaital I Nangia; Rita S Mehta
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2016-07-29

3.  Overexpression and activation of epidermal growth factor receptor in hemangioblastomas.

Authors:  Gregory J Chen; Matthias A Karajannis; Elizabeth W Newcomb; David Zagzag
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 4.130

4.  Clinicopathological features of tumors as predictors of the efficacy of primary neoadjuvant chemotherapy for operable breast cancer.

Authors:  Tadahiko Shien; Sadako Akashi-Tanaka; Kunihisa Miyakawa; Takashi Hojo; Chikako Shimizu; Kunihiko Seki; Masashi Ando; Tsutomu Kohno; Naruto Taira; Hiroyoshi Doihara; Noriyuki Katsumata; Yasuhiro Fujiwara; Takayuki Kinoshita
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  The majority of triple-negative breast cancer may correspond to basal-like carcinoma, but triple-negative breast cancer is not identical to basal-like carcinoma.

Authors:  Naoto Kuroda; Masahiko Ohara; Kaori Inoue; Keiko Mizuno; Nokiaki Fujishima; Nobumasa Hamaguchi; Gang-Hong Lee
Journal:  Med Mol Morphol       Date:  2009-06-18       Impact factor: 2.309

6.  An essential role of metalloprotease-disintegrin ADAM12 in triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Hui Li; Sara Duhachek-Muggy; Yue Qi; Yan Hong; Fariba Behbod; Anna Zolkiewska
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  β-Catenin is required for Ron receptor-induced mammary tumorigenesis.

Authors:  P K Wagh; J K Gray; G M Zinser; J Vasiliauskas; L James; S P Monga; S E Waltz
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 9.867

8.  Novel therapeutic strategies for malignant salivary gland tumors: lessons learned from breast cancer.

Authors:  Ryuichi Murase; Tomoki Sumida; Akiko Ishikawa; Rumi Murase; Sean D McAllister; Hiroyuki Hamakawa; Pierre-Yves Desprez
Journal:  Int J Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-11-21

9.  Identification of genomic aberrations in hemangioblastoma by droplet digital PCR and SNP microarray highlights novel candidate genes and pathways for pathogenesis.

Authors:  Ruty Mehrian-Shai; Michal Yalon; Itai Moshe; Iris Barshack; Dvorah Nass; Jasmine Jacob; Chen Dor; Juergen K V Reichardt; Shlomi Constantini; Amos Toren
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  EGFR-targeted CAR-T cells are potent and specific in suppressing triple-negative breast cancer both in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Lin Xia; Zao-Zao Zheng; Jun-Yi Liu; Yu-Jie Chen; Jian-Cheng Ding; Ning-Shao Xia; Wen-Xin Luo; Wen Liu
Journal:  Clin Transl Immunology       Date:  2020-05-03
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.