Satomi Onoue1, Yoshiko Tsuda. 1. Analytical Research and Development, Pfizer Global Research and Development, Nagoya Laboratories, Pfizer Japan Inc., 5-2 Taketoyo, Aichi, 470-2393, Japan. satomi.onoue@pfizer.com
Abstract
PURPOSE: Phototoxic responses after administration of photosensitive pharmaceutics have been recognized as undesirable side effects, and predicting potential hazardous side effects is gaining importance as new drugs are introduced to the market. In this work, we characterize the photochemical/photobiological properties of model compounds to develop an effective screening method for the prediction of phototoxic/photosensitive potential. METHODS: Twenty-one known photosensitive/phototoxic compounds and five weak/nonphototoxic compounds were subjected to ultraviolet (UV) spectral analyses and photochemical evaluation including the determination of produced reactive oxygen species (ROS) and photostability study. The photooxidation of linoleic acid was also monitored in the presence of tested compounds, guided on the formation of thiobarbituric acid reactive substances. RESULTS: Most photosensitive/phototoxic drugs tested, even weak UV absorbers, at a concentration of 200 microM showed significant production of ROS under 18 h light exposure (30,000 lx). On the other hand, ROS generated from weak/nonphototoxic compounds, including strong UV absorber benzocaine, were low or negligible. Although exposure of quinine to light resulted in significant degradation (half-life, t1/2=6.4 h), it was dramatically attenuated by the addition of ROS scavengers, especially sodium azide (t1/2=122.6 h). Furthermore, concomitant exposure of photosensitive/phototoxic compounds (200 microM) and linoleic acid (1 mM) for 18 h led to the marked formation of lipoperoxide. CONCLUSION: Results indicated that known photosensitive/phototoxic compounds tested have the ability to generate ROS under light exposure, and this photochemical reaction could be associated with their photoinstability and/or phototoxic responses. Based on these findings, determination of ROS, generated from photoirradiated compounds, may be an effective predictive model in recognizing their photosensitive/phototoxic potential.
PURPOSE: Phototoxic responses after administration of photosensitive pharmaceutics have been recognized as undesirable side effects, and predicting potential hazardous side effects is gaining importance as new drugs are introduced to the market. In this work, we characterize the photochemical/photobiological properties of model compounds to develop an effective screening method for the prediction of phototoxic/photosensitive potential. METHODS: Twenty-one known photosensitive/phototoxic compounds and five weak/nonphototoxic compounds were subjected to ultraviolet (UV) spectral analyses and photochemical evaluation including the determination of produced reactive oxygen species (ROS) and photostability study. The photooxidation of linoleic acid was also monitored in the presence of tested compounds, guided on the formation of thiobarbituric acid reactive substances. RESULTS: Most photosensitive/phototoxic drugs tested, even weak UV absorbers, at a concentration of 200 microM showed significant production of ROS under 18 h light exposure (30,000 lx). On the other hand, ROS generated from weak/nonphototoxic compounds, including strong UV absorber benzocaine, were low or negligible. Although exposure of quinine to light resulted in significant degradation (half-life, t1/2=6.4 h), it was dramatically attenuated by the addition of ROS scavengers, especially sodium azide (t1/2=122.6 h). Furthermore, concomitant exposure of photosensitive/phototoxic compounds (200 microM) and linoleic acid (1 mM) for 18 h led to the marked formation of lipoperoxide. CONCLUSION: Results indicated that known photosensitive/phototoxic compounds tested have the ability to generate ROS under light exposure, and this photochemical reaction could be associated with their photoinstability and/or phototoxic responses. Based on these findings, determination of ROS, generated from photoirradiated compounds, may be an effective predictive model in recognizing their photosensitive/phototoxic potential.
Authors: F Vargas; I Martinez Volkmar; J Sequera; H Mendez; J Rojas; G Fraile; M Velasquez; R Medina Journal: J Photochem Photobiol B Date: 1998-03 Impact factor: 6.252
Authors: C Arlett; L Earl; J Ferguson; N Gibbs; J Hawk; L Henderson; B Johnson; W Lovell; H D Menagé; S Navaratnam Journal: Br J Dermatol Date: 1995-02 Impact factor: 9.302
Authors: Kim Beyer; Frangis Nikfarjam; Manuel Butting; Markus Meissner; Anke König; Ana Ramirez Bosca; Roland Kaufmann; Detlef Heidemann; August Bernd; Stefan Kippenberger; Nadja Zöller Journal: J Cancer Date: 2017-05-11 Impact factor: 4.207