Literature DB >> 16307934

Are temporary inferior vena cava filters really temporary?

N N Kirilcuk1, E J Herget, R A Dicker, D A Spain, J C Hellinger, S I Brundage.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite significant risk for venous thromboembolism, severely injured trauma patients often are not candidates for prophylaxis or treatment with anticoagulation. Long-term inferior vena cava (IVC) filters are associated with increased risk of postphlebitic syndrome. Retrievable IVC filters potentially offer a better solution, but only if the filter is removed; our hypothesis is that the most of them are not.
METHODS: This retrospective study queried a level I trauma registry for IVC filter insertion from September 1997 through June 2004.
RESULTS: One IVC filter was placed before the availability of retrievable filters in 2001. Since 2001, 27 filters have been placed, indicating a change in practice patterns. Filters were placed for prophylaxis (n = 11) or for therapy in patients with pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis (n = 17). Of 23 temporary filters, only 8 (35%) were removed.
CONCLUSIONS: Surgeons must critically evaluate indications for IVC filter insertion, develop standard criteria for placement, and implement protocols to ensure timely removal of temporary IVC filters.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16307934     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.08.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  11 in total

Review 1.  Optional inferior vena caval filters: where are we now?

Authors:  A N Keeling; T B Kinney; M J Lee
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Implementation of an institutional protocol to improve inferior vena cava utilization and outcomes.

Authors:  Amihai Rottenstreich; Ariela Arad; Naama Lev Cohain; Allan I Bloom; David Varon; Alexander Klimov; Batia Roth; Yosef Kalish
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 2.300

3.  Ten-year experience of retrievable inferior vena cava filters in a tertiary referral center.

Authors:  George Tse; Trevor Cleveland; Stephen Goode
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2017 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.630

4.  Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism in Individuals with Spinal Cord Injury: Clinical Practice Guidelines for Health Care Providers, 3rd ed.: Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine.

Authors: 
Journal:  Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil       Date:  2016

Review 5.  Novel and Advanced Techniques for Complex IVC Filter Retrieval.

Authors:  Dania Daye; T Gregory Walker
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2017-04

Review 6.  Inferior vena cava filter retrievals, standard and novel techniques.

Authors:  Gokhan Kuyumcu; T Gregory Walker
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2016-12

7.  Clinical outcome of perioperative nonpermanent vena cava filter placement in patients with deep venous thrombosis or blood stasis of the vein.

Authors:  Kenji Ishihara; Shinichi Hiromatsu; Yusuke Shintani; Kurando Kanaya; Keita Mikasa; Shigeaki Aoyagi
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 2.549

8.  Rates and predictors of plans for inferior vena cava filter retrieval in hospitalized patients.

Authors:  John F Mission; Robert K Kerlan; Justin H Tan; Margaret C Fang
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Bedside placement of removable vena cava filters guided by intravascular ultrasound in the critically injured.

Authors:  Konstantinos Spaniolas; George C Velmahos; Christopher Kwolek; Alice Gervasini; Marc De Moya; Hasan B Alam
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Retrievable inferior vena cava filters may be safely applied in gastric bypass surgery.

Authors:  Rob Schuster; Judith C Hagedorn; Myriam J Curet; John M Morton
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-04-13       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.