Literature DB >> 1630772

Results of inpatient and outpatient cataract surgery. A historical cohort comparison.

G N Holland1, D T Earl, N C Wheeler, B R Straatsma, T H Pettit, R S Hepler, R E Christensen, R K Oye.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The transition from inpatient to outpatient cataract surgery during the last decade was not accompanied by prospective investigation of its effect on visual outcomes or surgical complications. The authors performed this study to assess the impact of this transition on surgical results.
METHODS: The authors reviewed 600 extracapsular cataract extractions performed by 4 experienced ophthalmic surgeons during a 36-month period; in 300 cases, patients were hospitalized after surgery (inpatient group), and, in 300 cases, patients were never hospitalized (outpatient group). The same surgical techniques were used in all cases. Visual outcome and rates for operative and postoperative complications were compared.
RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between the inpatient and outpatient groups for visual acuity. Excluding patients with pre-existing nonlenticular ocular disease, a best-corrected visual acuity of 20/40 or better was achieved in 93.1% of inpatient cases and in 97.2% of outpatient cases 6 months after surgery. Postoperative, clinically apparent cystoid macular edema was more common in the inpatient group (P = 0.03); however, after exclusion of patients with diabetes, hypertension, age younger than 65 years, and eyes with pre-existing nonlenticular disease, there was no statistically significant difference between groups. No significant differences in rates for other operative and postoperative complications were identified, including wound dehiscence, unplanned postoperative filtering blebs, infectious endophthalmitis, retinal detachment, persistent iridocyclitis, glaucoma, and corneal edema.
CONCLUSION: This study does not demonstrate that the transition to outpatient cataract extractions has had an adverse effect on surgical outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1630772     DOI: 10.1016/s0161-6420(92)31882-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  8 in total

Review 1.  Management of cataract.

Authors:  R Dickson; A Eastwood; P Gill; A Melville; S O'Meara; T Sheldon
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1996-09

2.  Impact of cataract surgery on car driving: a population based study in Sweden.

Authors:  E Mönestam; L Wachtmeister
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  [Medical malpractice in ophthalmology].

Authors:  K Spaniol; S Thanos; B Weber; D Friedburg; T Stupp
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.059

4.  The rate of outpatient cataract surgery in ten European countries: an analysis using data from the SHARE survey.

Authors:  S M Mojon-Azzi; D S Mojon
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-02-22       Impact factor: 3.535

5.  Day care cataract surgery in Central and Southern Italy: a multicentric survey.

Authors:  Salvatore Cillino; Alessandra Casuccio; Francesco Di Pace; Francesco Pillitteri; Giovanni Cillino; Gaetano Lodato
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-02-01       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  Satellite clinics in academic ophthalmology programs: an exploratory study of successes and challenges.

Authors:  Irene C Kuo
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-12-14       Impact factor: 2.209

7.  Retrospective evaluation of two-year results with a filtering trabeculotomy in comparison to conventional trabeculectomy by exact matching.

Authors:  Alicja Strzalkowska; Peter Strzalkowski; Yousef Al Yousef; Jost Hillenkamp; Franz Grehn; Nils A Loewen
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2020-10-15

8.  HIOP-Reader: Automated Data Extraction for the Analysis of Manually Recorded Nycthemeral IOPs and Glaucoma Progression.

Authors:  Vaia Agorastou; Julian Schön; Raoul Verma-Fuehring; Mohamad Dakroub; Jost Hillenkamp; Frank Puppe; Nils A Loewen
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 3.048

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.