Literature DB >> 16307634

The doctor will see you shortly. The ethical significance of time for the patient-physician relationship.

Clarence H Braddock1, Lois Snyder.   

Abstract

Many physicians and health care leaders express concern about the amount of time available for clinical practice. While debates rage on about how much time is truly available, the perception that time is inadequate is now pervasive. This perception has ethical significance, because it may cause clinicians to forego activities and behaviors that promote important aspects of the patient-physician relationship, to shortcut shared decision making, and to fall short of obligations to act as patient advocates. Furthermore, perceived time constraints can hinder the just distribution of physician time. Although creating more time in the clinical encounter would certainly address these ethical concerns, specific strategies-many of which do not take significantly more time-can effectively change the perception that time is inadequate. These approaches are critical for clinicians and health systems to maintain their ethical commitments and simultaneously deal with the realities of time.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16307634      PMCID: PMC1490262          DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.00217.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  48 in total

1.  Achieving greater patient throughput.

Authors:  Bruce McClennan
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 2.  Workload and job satisfaction among general practitioners: a review of the literature.

Authors:  P P Groenewegen; J B Hutten
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  Physicians' responses to financial incentives. Evidence from a for-profit ambulatory care center.

Authors:  D Hemenway; A Killen; S B Cashman; C L Parks; W J Bicknell
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1990-04-12       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Physicians' communication style and patient satisfaction.

Authors:  M K Buller; D B Buller
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  1987-12

5.  Satisfactions, dissatisfactions, and causes of stress in medical practice.

Authors:  B H Mawardi
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1979-04-06       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Patient trust: is it related to patient-centered behavior of primary care physicians?

Authors:  Kevin Fiscella; Sean Meldrum; Peter Franks; Cleveland G Shields; Paul Duberstein; Susan H McDaniel; Ronald M Epstein
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Work satisfaction of general practitioners and the quality of patient care.

Authors:  R Grol; H Mokkink; A Smits; J van Eijk; M Beek; P Mesker; J Mesker-Niesten
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 2.267

8.  Interaction exchange structure and patient satisfaction with medical interviews.

Authors:  W B Stiles; S M Putnam; M H Wolf; S A James
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1979-06       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Patient satisfaction with the clinical encounter: social psychological determinants.

Authors:  R Like; S J Zyzanski
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  Do physicians spend less time with older patients?

Authors:  S E Radecki; R L Kane; D H Solomon; R C Mendenhall; J C Beck
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 5.562

View more
  30 in total

1.  Root Cause Analysis (RCA) of Prolonged Laboratory Turnaround Time in a Tertiary Care Set up.

Authors:  Kalyan Khan
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-04-15

2.  Communication about behavioral health risks: a study of videotaped encounters in 2 internal medicine practices.

Authors:  Gregory Makoul; Anjali Dhurandhar; Mita Sanghavi Goel; Denise Scholtens; Alan S Rubin
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Three types of ambiguity in coding empathic interactions in primary care visits: implications for research and practice.

Authors:  Ashley L Stone; Ming Tai-Seale; Cheryl D Stults; Jamie M Luiz; Richard M Frankel
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2012-07-17

Review 4.  Telephone-based motivational interviewing for medication adherence: a systematic review.

Authors:  Benjamin S Teeter; Jan Kavookjian
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.046

5.  Does Patient Preference Measurement in Decision Aids Improve Decisional Conflict? A Randomized Trial in Men with Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Joseph D Shirk; Catherine M Crespi; Josemanuel D Saucedo; Sylvia Lambrechts; Ely Dahan; Robert Kaplan; Christopher Saigal
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.883

6.  Marijuana use among young women in a primary care setting.

Authors:  Jennifer S Rose; Debra S Herman; Claire Hagerty; Maureen G Phipps; Jeffrey F Peipert; Michael D Stein
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-03-20       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  The patient-centered medical home: an ethical analysis of principles and practice.

Authors:  Clarence H Braddock; Lois Snyder; Richard L Neubauer; Gary S Fischer
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  In-office discussions of migraine: results from the American Migraine Communication Study.

Authors:  Richard B Lipton; Steven R Hahn; Roger K Cady; Jan Lewis Brandes; Suzanne E Simons; Philip A Bain; Meaghan R Nelson
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-05-06       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Diabetes information technology: designing informatics systems to catalyze change in clinical care.

Authors:  William T Lester; Adrian H Zai; Henry C Chueh; Richard W Grant
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2008-03

10.  "Surgery is certainly one good option": quality and time-efficiency of informed decision-making in surgery.

Authors:  Clarence Braddock; Pamela L Hudak; Jacob J Feldman; Sylvia Bereknyei; Richard M Frankel; Wendy Levinson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 5.284

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.