BACKGROUND: Strengthened regulations concerning privacy of health information are affecting large-scale health outcomes research. OBJECTIVE: To create a data collection system that would facilitate outcomes research, avoid selection bias, and fulfill obligations to protect privacy. DESIGN: We created a web-based system that uses touch-screen computer technology for longitudinal collection of data. The system provides access to information in deidentified form, enables it to be linked to health services and outcomes data, and allows patients to join a research registry project (RRP) and be placed on a prospective subject list (PSL). PARTICIPANTS, MEASUREMENTS, AND RESULTS: Pilot testing in 86 consecutive patients who were seen at a large, urban, university-based general medicine practice and had a mean age of 50 years showed that 81 patients had no difficulty, 5 had some difficulty, and none had considerable difficulty using the computer technology to complete a health survey. No patients refused to complete the survey and all patients completed the entire survey. Forty-seven (55%) joined the RRP and 42 of these 47 (89%) joined the PSL. RRP participants were less likely than RRP nonparticipants to be divorced or widowed (P=.03) and less likely to have hypertension (P=.03) but had no other significant differences in sociodemographic or clinical characteristics. PSL participants did not differ from PSL nonparticipants. CONCLUSIONS: The new system ensures privacy and appears to facilitate research recruitment and avoid selection bias.
BACKGROUND: Strengthened regulations concerning privacy of health information are affecting large-scale health outcomes research. OBJECTIVE: To create a data collection system that would facilitate outcomes research, avoid selection bias, and fulfill obligations to protect privacy. DESIGN: We created a web-based system that uses touch-screen computer technology for longitudinal collection of data. The system provides access to information in deidentified form, enables it to be linked to health services and outcomes data, and allows patients to join a research registry project (RRP) and be placed on a prospective subject list (PSL). PARTICIPANTS, MEASUREMENTS, AND RESULTS: Pilot testing in 86 consecutive patients who were seen at a large, urban, university-based general medicine practice and had a mean age of 50 years showed that 81 patients had no difficulty, 5 had some difficulty, and none had considerable difficulty using the computer technology to complete a health survey. No patients refused to complete the survey and all patients completed the entire survey. Forty-seven (55%) joined the RRP and 42 of these 47 (89%) joined the PSL. RRP participants were less likely than RRP nonparticipants to be divorced or widowed (P=.03) and less likely to have hypertension (P=.03) but had no other significant differences in sociodemographic or clinical characteristics. PSL participants did not differ from PSL nonparticipants. CONCLUSIONS: The new system ensures privacy and appears to facilitate research recruitment and avoid selection bias.
Authors: Aruna D Pradhan; JoAnn E Manson; Jacques E Rossouw; David S Siscovick; Charles P Mouton; Nader Rifai; Robert B Wallace; Rebecca D Jackson; Mary B Pettinger; Paul M Ridker Journal: JAMA Date: 2002-08-28 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Eleanor Bimla Schwarz; Sara M Parisi; Sanithia L Williams; Grant J Shevchik; Rachel Hess Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2012 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Rachel Hess; Hilary Tindle; Molly B Conroy; Sunday Clark; Eric Yablonsky; Ron D Hays Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2014-08-08 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Rachel Hess; Gary S Fischer; Sarah M Sullivan; XinXin Dong; Melissa Weimer; Caroline Zeith; Sunday Clark; Mark S Roberts Journal: Telemed J E Health Date: 2014-09-22 Impact factor: 3.536