Literature DB >> 16305673

Triclosan-bacteria interactions: single or multiple target sites?

M Gomez Escalada1, A D Russell, J-Y Maillard, D Ochs.   

Abstract

AIMS: To investigate the inhibitory and lethal effects of triclosan against several micro-organisms at different stages of their phase of population growth. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Triclosan minimum inhibitory concentrations against several test organisms were determined in broth and agar using standard protocols. The bisphenol effect on bacterial population growth kinetics was studied using the Bioscreen C microbial growth analyser. Finally, the efficacy of triclosan on phases of bacterial growth was determined using a standard suspension test. The duration of the lag phase for all micro-organisms tested was increased by bisphenol in a concentration-dependent manner. The population growth kinetics of the micro-organisms was also altered after biocide exposure. At higher concentrations, triclosan was bactericidal regardless of their phase of population growth, although population in stationary phase and particularly, washed suspensions, were more resilient to the lethality of triclosan. This lethal activity was concentration and contact time dependent, and in some instances, bactericidal activity of bisphenol was observed within 15 s.
CONCLUSIONS: Low concentrations of triclosan affected the growth of several bacteria, while higher concentrations were bactericidal regardless of the bacterial phase of population growth. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: Here, we presented clear evidence that the interaction of triclosan with the bacterial cell is complex and its lethality cannot be explained solely by the inhibition of metabolic pathways such as the enoyl acyl-reductase. However, the inhibition of such pathways cannot be ruled out as part of the lethal mechanism of the bisphenol at a low bactericidal concentration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16305673     DOI: 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2005.01790.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lett Appl Microbiol        ISSN: 0266-8254            Impact factor:   2.858


  26 in total

Review 1.  Current and Emerging Topical Antibacterials and Antiseptics: Agents, Action, and Resistance Patterns.

Authors:  Deborah A Williamson; Glen P Carter; Benjamin P Howden
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 26.132

2.  Triclosan-induced aminoglycoside-tolerant Listeria monocytogenes isolates can appear as small-colony variants.

Authors:  Vicky G Kastbjerg; Line Hein-Kristensen; Lone Gram
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Removal of pharmaceuticals and personal care products during water recycling: microbial community structure and effects of substrate concentration.

Authors:  Kathryn M Onesios-Barry; David Berry; Jody B Proescher; I K Ashok Sivakumar; Edward J Bouwer
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Toxicogenomic response of Rhodospirillum rubrum S1H to the micropollutant triclosan.

Authors:  Benny F G Pycke; Guido Vanermen; Pieter Monsieurs; Heleen De Wever; Max Mergeay; Willy Verstraete; Natalie Leys
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-04-02       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 5.  Some nontoxic metal-based drugs for selected prevalent tropical pathogenic diseases.

Authors:  Saliu A Amolegbe; Caroline A Akinremi; Sheriff Adewuyi; Amudat Lawal; Mercy O Bamigboye; Joshua A Obaleye
Journal:  J Biol Inorg Chem       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 3.358

6.  An antibiotic-inducible cell wall-associated protein that protects Bacillus subtilis from autolysis.

Authors:  Letal I Salzberg; John D Helmann
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2007-05-04       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 7.  Triclosan: A Widespread Environmental Toxicant with Many Biological Effects.

Authors:  Mei-Fei Yueh; Robert H Tukey
Journal:  Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 13.820

8.  Absorption, pharmacokinetics, and safety of triclosan after dermal administration.

Authors:  Christian Queckenberg; Jürgen Meins; Bertil Wachall; Oxana Doroshyenko; Dorota Tomalik-Scharte; Bärbel Bastian; Mona Abdel-Tawab; Uwe Fuhr
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2009-10-12       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Genome-wide enrichment screening reveals multiple targets and resistance genes for triclosan in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Byung Jo Yu; Jung Ae Kim; Hyun Mok Ju; Soo-Kyung Choi; Seung Jin Hwang; Sungyoo Park; Euijoong Kim; Jae-Gu Pan
Journal:  J Microbiol       Date:  2012-11-04       Impact factor: 3.422

10.  A pathogenic fungi diphenyl ether phytotoxin targets plant enoyl (acyl carrier protein) reductase.

Authors:  Franck E Dayan; Daneel Ferreira; Yan-Hong Wang; Ikhlas A Khan; John A McInroy; Zhiqiang Pan
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2008-05-08       Impact factor: 8.340

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.