Literature DB >> 16304693

Effects of pulsed magnetic stimulation on tumor development and immune functions in mice.

Sachiko Yamaguchi1, Mari Ogiue-Ikeda, Masaki Sekino, Shoogo Ueno.   

Abstract

We investigated the effects of pulsed magnetic stimulation on tumor development processes and immune functions in mice. A circular coil (inner diameter = 15 mm, outer diameter = 75 mm) was used in the experiments. Stimulus conditions were pulse width = 238 micros, peak magnetic field = 0.25 T (at the center of the coil), frequency = 25 pulses/s, 1,000 pulses/sample/day and magnetically induced eddy currents in mice = 0.79-1.54 A/m(2). In an animal study, B16-BL6 melanoma model mice were exposed to the pulsed magnetic stimulation for 16 days from the day of injection of cancer cells. A tumor growth study revealed a significant tumor weight decrease in the stimulated group (54% of the sham group). In a cellular study, B16-BL6 cells were also exposed to the magnetic field (1,000 pulses/sample, and eddy currents at the bottom of the dish = 2.36-2.90 A/m(2)); however, the magnetically induced eddy currents had no effect on cell viabilities. Cytokine production in mouse spleens was measured to analyze the immunomodulatory effect after the pulsed magnetic stimulation. tumor necrosis factor (TNF-alpha) production in mouse spleens was significantly activated after the exposure of the stimulus condition described above. These results showed the first evidence of the anti-tumor effect and immunomodulatory effects brought about by the application of repetitive magnetic stimulation and also suggested the possible relationship between anti-tumor effects and the increase of TNF-alpha levels caused by pulsed magnetic stimulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16304693     DOI: 10.1002/bem.20177

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioelectromagnetics        ISSN: 0197-8462            Impact factor:   2.010


  11 in total

1.  A role for bioelectric effects in the induction of bystander signals by ionizing radiation?

Authors:  C Mothersill; G Moran; F McNeill; M D Gow; J Denbeigh; W Prestwich; C B Seymour
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2007-04-03       Impact factor: 2.658

2.  Effect of long-term pulsed electromagnetic field exposure on hepatic and immunologic functions of rats.

Authors:  Bao-lin Li; Wei Li; Jia-Qi Bi; Jian-gang Zhao; Zhi-Wei Qu; Chen Lin; Song-Lin Yang; Qing-gang Meng; Qi Yue
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2015-04-25       Impact factor: 1.704

3.  Alternative medicine techniques have non-linear effects on radiation response and can alter the expression of radiation induced bystander effects.

Authors:  Carmel Mothersill; Richard Smith; Matthew Henry; Colin Seymour; Raimond Wong
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 2.658

4.  Effect of magnetic fields on tumor growth and viability.

Authors:  Ivan Tatarov; Aruna Panda; Daniel Petkov; Krishnan Kolappaswamy; Keyata Thompson; Anoop Kavirayani; Michael M Lipsky; Edward Elson; Christopher C Davis; Stuart S Martin; Louis J DeTolla
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 0.982

5.  Carbonic anhydrase I, II, and VI, blood plasma, erythrocyte and saliva zinc and copper increase after repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Robert I Henkin; Samuel J Potolicchio; Lucien M Levy; Ramy Moharram; Irina Velicu; Brian M Martin
Journal:  Am J Med Sci       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.378

6.  Inhibition of cancer cell growth by exposure to a specific time-varying electromagnetic field involves T-type calcium channels.

Authors:  Carly A Buckner; Alison L Buckner; Stan A Koren; Michael A Persinger; Robert M Lafrenie
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Optimization of a therapeutic electromagnetic field (EMF) to retard breast cancer tumor growth and vascularity.

Authors:  Ivan L Cameron; Marko S Markov; W Elaine Hardman
Journal:  Cancer Cell Int       Date:  2014-12-07       Impact factor: 5.722

8.  Low intensity and frequency pulsed electromagnetic fields selectively impair breast cancer cell viability.

Authors:  Sara Crocetti; Christian Beyer; Grit Schade; Marcel Egli; Jürg Fröhlich; Alfredo Franco-Obregón
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Low frequency magnetic fields enhance antitumor immune response against mouse H22 hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Yunzhong Nie; Yueqiu Chen; Yongbin Mou; Leihua Weng; Zhenjun Xu; Youwei Du; Wenmei Wang; Yayi Hou; Tingting Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Dynamic 1H-MRS assessment of brain tumors: a novel approach for differential diagnosis of glioma.

Authors:  Tong Tong; Zhong Yang; John W Chen; Jianming Zhu; Zhenwei Yao
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2015-10-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.