Literature DB >> 16304073

High-risk patients with acute coronary syndromes treated with low-molecular-weight or unfractionated heparin: outcomes at 6 months and 1 year in the SYNERGY trial.

Kenneth W Mahaffey1, Marc Cohen, Jyotsna Garg, Elliott Antman, Neal S Kleiman, Shaun G Goodman, Lisa G Berdan, Craig J Reist, Anatoly Langer, Harvey D White, Philip E Aylward, Jacques J Col, James J Ferguson, Robert M Califf.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: The SYNERGY trial comparing enoxaparin and unfractionated heparin in high-risk patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) showed that enoxaparin was not inferior to unfractionated heparin in reducing death or nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI) at 30 days.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate continued risk in this patient cohort through 6-month and 1-year follow-up. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Overall, 9978 patients were randomized from August 2001 through December 2003 in 487 hospitals in 12 countries. Patients were followed up for 6 months and for 1 year. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Six-month outcomes were death, nonfatal MI, revascularization procedures, stroke, and site-investigator-reported need for rehospitalization; 1-year outcome was all-cause death.
RESULTS: Six-month and 1-year follow-up data were available for 9957 (99.8%) and 9608 (96.3%) of 9978 patients, respectively; 541 patients (5.4%) had died at 6 months and 739 (7.4%) at 1 year. Death or nonfatal MI at 6 months occurred in 872 patients receiving enoxaparin (17.6%) vs 884 receiving unfractionated heparin (17.8%) (hazard ratio [HR], 0.98; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.89-1.07; P = .65). In the subgroup of patients receiving consistent therapy, ie, only enoxaparin or unfractionated heparin during the index hospitalization (n = 6138), a reduction in death or nonfatal MI with enoxaparin was maintained at 180 days (HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.75-0.95; P = .006). Rehospitalization within 180 days occurred in 858 patients receiving enoxaparin (17.9%) and 911 receiving unfractionated heparin (19.0%) (HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.85-1.03; P = .17). One-year all-cause death rates were similar in the 2 treatment groups (380/4974 [7.6%] for enoxaparin vs 359/4948 [7.3%] for unfractionated heparin; HR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.92-1.22; P = .44). One-year death rates in patients receiving consistent therapy were also similar (251/3386 [7.4%] for enoxaparin vs 213/2720 [7.8%] for unfractionated heparin; HR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.79-1.14; P = .55).
CONCLUSIONS: In the SYNERGY trial, patients continued to experience adverse cardiac events through long-term follow-up. The effect of enoxaparin on death or MI compared with that of unfractionated heparin at 6 months was similar to that observed at 30 days in the overall trial and in the consistent-therapy group. One-year death rates were also similar in both groups. High-risk patients with ACS remain susceptible to continued cardiac events despite aggressive therapies.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00043784.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16304073     DOI: 10.1001/jama.294.20.2594

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  11 in total

Review 1.  The REG1 anticoagulation system: a novel actively controlled factor IX inhibitor using RNA aptamer technology for treatment of acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  John Paul Vavalle; Mauricio G Cohen
Journal:  Future Cardiol       Date:  2012-03-15

2.  Current and Future Options for Anticoagulant Therapy in the Acute Management of ACS.

Authors:  Charles V Pollack
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2013-02

Review 3.  Acute coronary syndrome in the patient with diabetes: is the management different?

Authors:  Amit P Amin; Steven P Marso
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 4.  Antithrombotic therapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome and diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  S Farhan; I Tentzeris; M K Freynhofer; B Vogel; K Huber
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.443

Review 5.  Antithrombotic therapy in patients with coronary artery disease and with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Serdar Farhan; Thomas Höchtl; Alexandra Kautzky-Willer; Johann Wojta; Kurt Huber
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2010-01

Review 6.  Diabetes mellitus and acute coronary syndrome: lessons from randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Sanjum S Sethi; Elias G Akl; Michael E Farkouh
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.810

7.  Efficacy and safety of optimized antithrombotic therapy with aspirin, clopidogrel and enoxaparin in patients with non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes in clinical practice.

Authors:  Tobias Heer; Claus Juenger; Anselm K Gitt; Timm Bauer; Frank Towae; Ralf Zahn; Jochen Senges; Uwe Zeymer
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2008-12-20       Impact factor: 2.300

8.  Prediction of one-year survival in high-risk patients with acute coronary syndromes: results from the SYNERGY trial.

Authors:  Kenneth W Mahaffey; Qinghong Yang; Karen S Pieper; Elliott M Antman; Harvey D White; Shaun G Goodman; Marc Cohen; Neal S Kleiman; Anatoly Langer; Philip E Aylward; Jacques J Col; Craig Reist; James J Ferguson; Robert M Califf
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-01-15       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 9.  Management of patients with unstable angina / non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a critical review of the 2007 ACC /AHA guidelines.

Authors:  J Hoekstra; M Cohen
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2009-02-13       Impact factor: 2.503

10.  Biomarkers and Bioassays for Cardiovascular Diseases: Present and Future.

Authors:  Derek S Sim; Hsiao Lieu; Patrick Andre
Journal:  Biomark Insights       Date:  2008-05-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.