OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to explore the feasibility and utility of 2D chemical shift imaging (CSI) MR spectroscopy in the evaluation of new areas of contrast enhancement at the site of a previously treated brain neoplasm. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two-dimensional CSI (point-resolved spectroscopy sequence [PRESS]; TR/TE, 1,500/144) was performed in 29 consecutive patients (4-54 years old; mean age, 34 years) who had a new contrast-enhancing lesion in the vicinity of a previously diagnosed and treated brain neoplasm. Clinical and imaging follow-up, and histopathology in 16 patients, were used as indicators of the identity of a lesion. RESULTS: Diagnostic-quality spectra were obtained in 97% of the patients. The Cho/Cr (choline/creatine) and Cho/NAA (choline/N-acetyl aspartate) ratios were significantly higher, and the NAA/Cr ratios significantly lower, in tumor than in radiation injury (all three differences, p < 0.0001). The Cho/Cr and Cho/NAA ratios were significantly higher in radiation injury than in normal-appearing white matter (p < 0.0003 and p < 0.0001, respectively), whereas NAA/Cr ratios were not different (p = 0.075). Mean Cho/Cr ratios were 2.52 for tumor, 1.57 for radiation injury, and 1.14 for normal-appearing white matter. Mean Cho/NAA ratios were 3.48, 1.31, 0.79, and mean NAA/Cr ratios were 0.79, 1.22, and 1.38, respectively. When values greater than 1.8 for either Cho/Cr or Cho/NAA ratios were considered evidence of tumor, 27 of 28 patients could be correctly classified. CONCLUSION: Two-dimensional CSI MR spectroscopy can differentiate tumor from radiation injury in patients with recurrent contrast-enhancing intracranial lesions. In these lesions, the Cho/NAA and Cho/Cr ratios may be the best numeric discriminators.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to explore the feasibility and utility of 2D chemical shift imaging (CSI) MR spectroscopy in the evaluation of new areas of contrast enhancement at the site of a previously treated brain neoplasm. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two-dimensional CSI (point-resolved spectroscopy sequence [PRESS]; TR/TE, 1,500/144) was performed in 29 consecutive patients (4-54 years old; mean age, 34 years) who had a new contrast-enhancing lesion in the vicinity of a previously diagnosed and treated brain neoplasm. Clinical and imaging follow-up, and histopathology in 16 patients, were used as indicators of the identity of a lesion. RESULTS: Diagnostic-quality spectra were obtained in 97% of the patients. The Cho/Cr (choline/creatine) and Cho/NAA (choline/N-acetyl aspartate) ratios were significantly higher, and the NAA/Cr ratios significantly lower, in tumor than in radiation injury (all three differences, p < 0.0001). The Cho/Cr and Cho/NAA ratios were significantly higher in radiation injury than in normal-appearing white matter (p < 0.0003 and p < 0.0001, respectively), whereas NAA/Cr ratios were not different (p = 0.075). Mean Cho/Cr ratios were 2.52 for tumor, 1.57 for radiation injury, and 1.14 for normal-appearing white matter. Mean Cho/NAA ratios were 3.48, 1.31, 0.79, and mean NAA/Cr ratios were 0.79, 1.22, and 1.38, respectively. When values greater than 1.8 for either Cho/Cr or Cho/NAA ratios were considered evidence of tumor, 27 of 28 patients could be correctly classified. CONCLUSION: Two-dimensional CSI MR spectroscopy can differentiate tumor from radiation injury in patients with recurrent contrast-enhancing intracranial lesions. In these lesions, the Cho/NAA and Cho/Cr ratios may be the best numeric discriminators.
Authors: Rajan Jain; Jayant Narang; Pia M Sundgren; David Hearshen; Sona Saksena; Jack P Rock; Jorge Gutierrez; Tom Mikkelsen Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2010-02-24 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: William R Masch; Page I Wang; Thomas L Chenevert; Larry Junck; Christina Tsien; Jason A Heth; Pia C Sundgren Journal: Acad Radiol Date: 2016-02-23 Impact factor: 3.173
Authors: Robert H Press; Jim Zhong; Saumya S Gurbani; Brent D Weinberg; Bree R Eaton; Hyunsuk Shim; Hui-Kuo G Shu Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2019-08-01 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: Ramon F Barajas; Jamie S Chang; Mark R Segal; Andrew T Parsa; Michael W McDermott; Mitchel S Berger; Soonmee Cha Journal: Radiology Date: 2009-09-29 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Eiji Matsusue; James R Fink; Jason K Rockhill; Toshihide Ogawa; Kenneth R Maravilla Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2009-10-16 Impact factor: 2.804