Alana J Zhou1, Keiko Kitamura, Barry A Weissman. 1. Department of Ophthalmology, The Jules Stein Eye Institute, The David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 100 Stein Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90095-7003, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To quantify the complexity involved in fitting contact lenses on the eyes of patients with keratoconus. METHODS: The contact lens care of one randomly selected eye each of 38 keratoconus patients was retrospectively analyzed and compared to that of 38 gender and age matched controls. We evaluated the number of diagnostic contact lenses used to establish the initial contact lens order, number of ordered rigid gas permeable (RGP) contact lenses needed to complete the fit, number of office visits during the initial 4 months of care, best spectacle and RGP contact lenses corrected Log MAR visual acuities, complications encountered, and whether or not the patient was successful in contact lens wear. RESULTS: Keratoconic eyes statistically used more diagnostic lenses, more ordered lenses, and more office visits than did normal eyes. Visual acuities improved from an average of 20/40 with spectacles to an average of 20/20 by use of RGP contact lenses in keratoconic eyes. Visions were corrected to 20/20 with both spectacles and contact lenses in control eyes. Sixty nine percent (69%) of keratoconic eyes and 95% of controls were successful in contact lens wear. CONCLUSIONS: Contact lens care of keratoconic eyes is more challenging than care of normal eyes because of the need for more diagnostic and ordered contact lenses and the use of more professional time. Keratoconic eyes may suffer more complications than normals during contact lens care, but this does not affect the success rates, and such patients benefit from enhanced visual acuity with RGP contact lenses compared to that achieved with spectacles.
PURPOSE: To quantify the complexity involved in fitting contact lenses on the eyes of patients with keratoconus. METHODS: The contact lens care of one randomly selected eye each of 38 keratoconus patients was retrospectively analyzed and compared to that of 38 gender and age matched controls. We evaluated the number of diagnostic contact lenses used to establish the initial contact lens order, number of ordered rigid gas permeable (RGP) contact lenses needed to complete the fit, number of office visits during the initial 4 months of care, best spectacle and RGP contact lenses corrected Log MAR visual acuities, complications encountered, and whether or not the patient was successful in contact lens wear. RESULTS:Keratoconic eyes statistically used more diagnostic lenses, more ordered lenses, and more office visits than did normal eyes. Visual acuities improved from an average of 20/40 with spectacles to an average of 20/20 by use of RGP contact lenses in keratoconic eyes. Visions were corrected to 20/20 with both spectacles and contact lenses in control eyes. Sixty nine percent (69%) of keratoconic eyes and 95% of controls were successful in contact lens wear. CONCLUSIONS: Contact lens care of keratoconic eyes is more challenging than care of normal eyes because of the need for more diagnostic and ordered contact lenses and the use of more professional time. Keratoconic eyes may suffer more complications than normals during contact lens care, but this does not affect the success rates, and such patients benefit from enhanced visual acuity with RGP contact lenses compared to that achieved with spectacles.