Literature DB >> 16302250

Comparison of ureteral washing and biopsy specimens in the community setting.

Andrew A Renshaw1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ureteral lesions can be difficult to diagnose. The value of ureteral biopsy in addition to ureteral washings has not been defined clearly.
METHODS: All ureteral washings and biopsies with follow-up that were performed at a single institution were reviewed.
RESULTS: In total, 39 patients underwent ureteral washing, ureteral biopsy, or both and had follow-up: Eighteen patients had urothelial tumors at follow-up (14 high-grade carcinomas, 3 low-grade carcinomas, and 1 papillary urothelial neoplasm of low malignant potential). The sensitivity was 79% for washings and 71% for biopsies (P = 1.0), for a combined sensitivity of 100%. Biopsies often were scant, and cell blocks from biopsies and washings often were of value.
CONCLUSIONS: Ureteral washings and biopsies had similar sensitivity and appeared to be complementary. Cell blocks often are useful for both specimen types. (c) 2005 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16302250     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.21456

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  8 in total

1.  Standardized ex vivo comparison of different upper urinary tract biopsy devices: impact on ureterorenoscopes and tissue quality.

Authors:  M Ritter; C Bolenz; T Bach; P Ströbel; A Häcker
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Diagnostic role of urine cytology and ureteroscopic biopsies in detection of high grade upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Yani Zhao; Fang-Ming Deng; Jonathan Melamed; William C Huang; Hongying Huang; Qinghu Ren
Journal:  Am J Clin Exp Urol       Date:  2021-06-15

Review 3.  Update of the ICUD-SIU consultation on upper tract urothelial carcinoma 2016: treatment of low-risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Rao S Mandalapu; Mesut Remzi; Theo M de Reijke; Vitaly Margulis; J Palou; A Kapoor; Ofer Yossepowitch; Jonathan Coleman; Olivier Traxer; J Kyle Anderson; James Catto; Jean de la Rosette; Timothy O'Brien; Anthony Zlotta; Surena F Matin
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Urinary cytology with acridine orange fluorescence is highly valuable for predicting high-grade upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Jing Li; Zhihong Zhang; Jin Wang; Changwen Zhang; Haibo Li; Yong Xu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2014-01-15

Review 5.  Epidemiology, diagnosis, preoperative evaluation and prognostic assessment of upper-tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC).

Authors:  Francesco Soria; Shahrokh F Shariat; Seth P Lerner; Hans-Martin Fritsche; Michael Rink; Wassim Kassouf; Philippe E Spiess; Yair Lotan; Dingwei Ye; Mario I Fernández; Eiji Kikuchi; Daher C Chade; Marko Babjuk; Arthur P Grollman; George N Thalmann
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 6.  The Diagnostic Dilemma of Urothelial Tissue Fragments in Urinary Tract Cytology Specimens.

Authors:  Derek B Allison; M Lisa Zhang; Poonam Vohra; Christopher J VandenBussche
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-08

7.  Fluorescence in situ hybridization in 1 mL of selective urine for the detection of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a feasibility study.

Authors:  J E Freund; E I M L Liem; C D Savci-Heijink; T M de Reijke
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 3.064

8.  Upper tract urinary cytology to detect upper tract urothelial carcinoma: Using the Johns Hopkins Hospital template and evaluation of its feasibility.

Authors:  Longwen Chen; Huiying He; Matthew A Zarka; Ming Zhou; Cristina Magi-Galluzzi
Journal:  Cytojournal       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 2.091

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.