Literature DB >> 16301275

A multicenter study of the Ambu laryngeal mask in nonparalyzed, anesthetized patients.

Carin A Hagberg1, Frank Samsoe Jensen, Harald V Genzwuerker, Renée Krivosic-Horber, Bettina U Schmitz, Jochen Hinkelbein, Marius Contzen, Herve Menu, Karim Bourzoufi.   

Abstract

We designed this multicenter trial to evaluate the performance and safety of the Ambu laryngeal mask, a new disposable supraglottic airway device, in patients scheduled for elective surgery. One-hundred-eighteen nonparalyzed, anesthetized patients (ASA physical status I-II, age, 18-65 yr, body mass index, 18-30 kg/m(-2)) receiving total IV anesthesia were included in this study. After device insertion, fiberoptic position and oropharyngeal leak pressure were determined at an intracuff pressure of 60 cm H2O. Ease of ventilation was determined by controlling ventilation at 6 mL/kg tidal volume. Any complications were noted and recorded. Device placement was successful in all patients on the first or second attempt (92.4% or 7.6%, respectively) with an insertion time (removal of face mask until first tidal volume) of 44.9 +/- 37.91 s. Adequate ventilation was achieved in all patients and the vocal cords could be visualized by fiberoptic endoscopy in 91.5% of patients. Oropharyngeal leak pressures were 24.1 +/- 5.44 cm H2O. Blood was detected on the device in 8.5% of patients. Complications and patient complaints were minor and quickly resolved. The Ambu laryngeal mask is easy and quick to insert and provides a safe and efficient seal during positive pressure ventilation in nonparalyzed patients scheduled for elective surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16301275     DOI: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000184181.92140.7C

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  8 in total

1.  [Comparison of two different laryngeal mask models for airway management in patients with immobilization of the cervical spine].

Authors:  C Gernoth; O Jandewerth; M Contzen; J Hinkelbein; H Genzwürker
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  [Evaluation of the new supraglottic airway devices Ambu AuraOnce and Intersurgical i-gel. Positioning, sealing, patient comfort and airway morbidity].

Authors:  J F Heuer; M Stiller; J Rathgeber; C Eich; K Züchner; M Bauer; A Timmermann
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.041

3.  Comparative evaluation of Intubating Laryngeal Mask Airway (ILMA), I-gel and Ambu AuraGain for blind tracheal intubation in adults.

Authors:  Riniki Sarma; Rakesh Kumar; Neera Gupta Kumar; Munisha Agarwal; Manoj Bhardwaj; Saud Ahmed Ansari; G P Deepak
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2021-09-21

4.  Randomised Comparison of the AMBU AuraOnce Laryngeal Mask and the LMA Unique Laryngeal Mask Airway in Spontaneously Breathing Adults.

Authors:  Daryl Lindsay Williams; James M Zeng; Karl D Alexander; David T Andrews
Journal:  Anesthesiol Res Pract       Date:  2012-02-29

5.  The AMBU® Aura-i™ Laryngeal Mask and LMA Supreme™: A Randomized Trial of Clinical Performance and Fibreoptic Positioning in Unparalysed, Anaesthetised Patients by Novices.

Authors:  Zanahriah Yahaya; Wendy H Teoh; Nora A Dintan; Ravi Agrawal
Journal:  Anesthesiol Res Pract       Date:  2016-10-25

6.  Comparative study of the Ambu® AuraOnce™ laryngeal mask and endotracheal intubation in anesthesia airway management during neurosurgery.

Authors:  Qiaoyun Zhang; Yongxing Sun; Baoguo Wang; Shuangyan Wang; Feng Mu; Yunxin Zhang
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 1.671

7.  Clinical performance of Ambu AuraGainTM versus i-gelTM in anesthetized children: a prospective, randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Ji-Hyun Lee; Seungpyo Nam; Young-Eun Jang; Eun-Hee Kim; Hee-Soo Kim; Jin-Tae Kim
Journal:  Anesth Pain Med (Seoul)       Date:  2020-04-29

8.  Ambu AuraOnce versus i-gel laryngeal mask airway in infants and children undergoing surgical procedures. A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Abdulrahman M Alzahem; Mansoor Aqil; Tariq A Alzahrani; Ayman H Aljazaeri
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.484

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.