Literature DB >> 16299392

Assessing the fidelity of ancient DNA sequences amplified from nuclear genes.

Jonas Binladen1, Carsten Wiuf, M Thomas P Gilbert, Michael Bunce, Ross Barnett, Greger Larson, Alex D Greenwood, James Haile, Simon Y W Ho, Anders J Hansen, Eske Willerslev.   

Abstract

To date, the field of ancient DNA has relied almost exclusively on mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) sequences. However, a number of recent studies have reported the successful recovery of ancient nuclear DNA (nuDNA) sequences, thereby allowing the characterization of genetic loci directly involved in phenotypic traits of extinct taxa. It is well documented that postmortem damage in ancient mtDNA can lead to the generation of artifactual sequences. However, as yet no one has thoroughly investigated the damage spectrum in ancient nuDNA. By comparing clone sequences from 23 fossil specimens, recovered from environments ranging from permafrost to desert, we demonstrate the presence of miscoding lesion damage in both the mtDNA and nuDNA, resulting in insertion of erroneous bases during amplification. Interestingly, no significant differences in the frequency of miscoding lesion damage are recorded between mtDNA and nuDNA despite great differences in cellular copy numbers. For both mtDNA and nuDNA, we find significant positive correlations between total sequence heterogeneity and the rates of type 1 transitions (adenine --> guanine and thymine --> cytosine) and type 2 transitions (cytosine --> thymine and guanine --> adenine), respectively. Type 2 transitions are by far the most dominant and increase relative to those of type 1 with damage load. The results suggest that the deamination of cytosine (and 5-methyl cytosine) to uracil (and thymine) is the main cause of miscoding lesions in both ancient mtDNA and nuDNA sequences. We argue that the problems presented by postmortem damage, as well as problems with contamination from exogenous sources of conserved nuclear genes, allelic variation, and the reliance on single nucleotide polymorphisms, call for great caution in studies relying on ancient nuDNA sequences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16299392      PMCID: PMC1456239          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.105.049718

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  45 in total

1.  Statistical evidence for miscoding lesions in ancient DNA templates.

Authors:  A Hansen; E Willerslev; C Wiuf; T Mourier; P Arctander
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 16.240

2.  Brief communication: discouraging prospects for ancient DNA from India.

Authors:  S S Kumar; I Nasidze; S R Walimbe; M Stoneking
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.868

3.  Characterization of genetic miscoding lesions caused by postmortem damage.

Authors:  M Thomas P Gilbert; Anders J Hansen; Eske Willerslev; Lars Rudbeck; Ian Barnes; Niels Lynnerup; Alan Cooper
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2002-12-13       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Distribution patterns of postmortem damage in human mitochondrial DNA.

Authors:  M Thomas P Gilbert; Eske Willerslev; Anders J Hansen; Ian Barnes; Lars Rudbeck; Niels Lynnerup; Alan Cooper
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2002-12-12       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Mutations induced by ancient DNA extracts?

Authors:  D Serre; M Hofreiter; S Pääbo
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2004-04-14       Impact factor: 16.240

Review 6.  Geologically ancient DNA: fact or artefact?

Authors:  Martin B Hebsgaard; Matthew J Phillips; Eske Willerslev
Journal:  Trends Microbiol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 17.079

7.  The retrieval of ancient human DNA sequences.

Authors:  O Handt; M Krings; R H Ward; S Pääbo
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  Worldwide phylogeography of wild boar reveals multiple centers of pig domestication.

Authors:  Greger Larson; Keith Dobney; Umberto Albarella; Meiying Fang; Elizabeth Matisoo-Smith; Judith Robins; Stewart Lowden; Heather Finlayson; Tina Brand; Eske Willerslev; Peter Rowley-Conwy; Leif Andersson; Alan Cooper
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-03-11       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Complete nucleotide sequences of the domestic cat (Felis catus) mitochondrial genome and a transposed mtDNA tandem repeat (Numt) in the nuclear genome.

Authors:  J V Lopez; S Cevario; S J O'Brien
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  1996-04-15       Impact factor: 5.736

10.  DNA damage and DNA sequence retrieval from ancient tissues.

Authors:  M Höss; P Jaruga; T H Zastawny; M Dizdaroglu; S Pääbo
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1996-04-01       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  37 in total

1.  A Bayesian phylogenetic method to estimate unknown sequence ages.

Authors:  Beth Shapiro; Simon Y W Ho; Alexei J Drummond; Marc A Suchard; Oliver G Pybus; Andrew Rambaut
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 16.240

2.  Patterns of nucleotide misincorporations during enzymatic amplification and direct large-scale sequencing of ancient DNA.

Authors:  M Stiller; R E Green; M Ronan; J F Simons; L Du; W He; M Egholm; J M Rothberg; S G Keates; S G Keats; N D Ovodov; E E Antipina; G F Baryshnikov; Y V Kuzmin; A A Vasilevski; G E Wuenschell; J Termini; M Hofreiter; V Jaenicke-Després; S Pääbo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-08-25       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  A statistical approach to identify ancient template DNA.

Authors:  Agnar Helgason; Snaebjörn Pálsson; Carles Lalueza-Fox; Shyamali Ghosh; Sigrún Sigurdardóttir; Adam Baker; Birgir Hrafnkelsson; Lilja Arnadóttir; Unnur Thorsteinsdóttir; Kári Stefánsson
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2007-06-25       Impact factor: 2.395

4.  Ancient bacteria show evidence of DNA repair.

Authors:  Sarah Stewart Johnson; Martin B Hebsgaard; Torben R Christensen; Mikhail Mastepanov; Rasmus Nielsen; Kasper Munch; Tina Brand; M Thomas P Gilbert; Maria T Zuber; Michael Bunce; Regin Rønn; David Gilichinsky; Duane Froese; Eske Willerslev
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-08-29       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Postmortem miscoding lesions in sequence analysis of human ancient mitochondrial DNA.

Authors:  Ryan Lamers; Shana Hayter; Carney D Matheson
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2008-12-06       Impact factor: 2.395

Review 6.  Ancient DNA damage.

Authors:  Jesse Dabney; Matthias Meyer; Svante Pääbo
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 10.005

7.  True single-molecule DNA sequencing of a pleistocene horse bone.

Authors:  Ludovic Orlando; Aurelien Ginolhac; Maanasa Raghavan; Julia Vilstrup; Morten Rasmussen; Kim Magnussen; Kathleen E Steinmann; Philipp Kapranov; John F Thompson; Grant Zazula; Duane Froese; Ida Moltke; Beth Shapiro; Michael Hofreiter; Khaled A S Al-Rasheid; M Thomas P Gilbert; Eske Willerslev
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 9.043

8.  The 'PREXCEL-Q Method' for qPCR.

Authors:  Jack M Gallup; Mark R Ackermann
Journal:  Int J Biomed Sci       Date:  2008-12-15

9.  Non-destructive sampling of ancient insect DNA.

Authors:  Philip Francis Thomsen; Scott Elias; M Thomas P Gilbert; James Haile; Kasper Munch; Svetlana Kuzmina; Duane G Froese; Andrei Sher; Richard N Holdaway; Eske Willerslev
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Archaeogenetic evidence of ancient nubian barley evolution from six to two-row indicates local adaptation.

Authors:  Sarah A Palmer; Jonathan D Moore; Alan J Clapham; Pamela Rose; Robin G Allaby
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-07-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.