Literature DB >> 15866038

Geologically ancient DNA: fact or artefact?

Martin B Hebsgaard1, Matthew J Phillips, Eske Willerslev.   

Abstract

Studies continue to report ancient DNA sequences and viable microbial cells that are many millions of years old. In this paper we evaluate some of the most extravagant claims of geologically ancient DNA. We conclude that although exciting, the reports suffer from inadequate experimental setup and insufficient authentication of results. Consequently, it remains doubtful whether amplifiable DNA sequences and viable bacteria can survive over geological timescales. To enhance the credibility of future studies and assist in discarding false-positive results, we propose a rigorous set of authentication criteria for work with geologically ancient DNA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15866038     DOI: 10.1016/j.tim.2005.03.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Microbiol        ISSN: 0966-842X            Impact factor:   17.079


  30 in total

1.  Assessing the fidelity of ancient DNA sequences amplified from nuclear genes.

Authors:  Jonas Binladen; Carsten Wiuf; M Thomas P Gilbert; Michael Bunce; Ross Barnett; Greger Larson; Alex D Greenwood; James Haile; Simon Y W Ho; Anders J Hansen; Eske Willerslev
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-11-19       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Ancient DNA research goes nuclear. A new technique to extract sequence data from nuclear DNA may reveal exciting new insights into evolution and phylogeny.

Authors:  Philip Hunter
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 8.807

3.  Crosslinks rather than strand breaks determine access to ancient DNA sequences from frozen sediments.

Authors:  Anders J Hansen; David L Mitchell; Carsten Wiuf; Lakshmi Paniker; Tina B Brand; Jonas Binladen; David A Gilichinsky; Regin Rønn; Eske Willerslev
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-04-02       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  A statistical approach to identify ancient template DNA.

Authors:  Agnar Helgason; Snaebjörn Pálsson; Carles Lalueza-Fox; Shyamali Ghosh; Sigrún Sigurdardóttir; Adam Baker; Birgir Hrafnkelsson; Lilja Arnadóttir; Unnur Thorsteinsdóttir; Kári Stefánsson
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2007-06-25       Impact factor: 2.395

5.  Ancient bacteria show evidence of DNA repair.

Authors:  Sarah Stewart Johnson; Martin B Hebsgaard; Torben R Christensen; Mikhail Mastepanov; Rasmus Nielsen; Kasper Munch; Tina Brand; M Thomas P Gilbert; Maria T Zuber; Michael Bunce; Regin Rønn; David Gilichinsky; Duane Froese; Eske Willerslev
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-08-29       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Microbial Cretaceous park: biodiversity of microbial fossils entrapped in amber.

Authors:  Ana Martín-González; Jacek Wierzchos; Juan C Gutiérrez; Jesús Alonso; Carmen Ascaso
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2009-02-12

7.  Bacterial natural transformation by highly fragmented and damaged DNA.

Authors:  Søren Overballe-Petersen; Klaus Harms; Ludovic A A Orlando; J Victor Moreno Mayar; Simon Rasmussen; Tais W Dahl; Minik T Rosing; Anthony M Poole; Thomas Sicheritz-Ponten; Søren Brunak; Sabrina Inselmann; Johann de Vries; Wilfried Wackernagel; Oliver G Pybus; Rasmus Nielsen; Pål Jarle Johnsen; Kaare Magne Nielsen; Eske Willerslev
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-11-18       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Microbial seed banks: the ecological and evolutionary implications of dormancy.

Authors:  Jay T Lennon; Stuart E Jones
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 60.633

Review 9.  Ancient population genomics and the study of evolution.

Authors:  M Parks; S Subramanian; C Baroni; M C Salvatore; G Zhang; C D Millar; D M Lambert
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-01-19       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  Estimates of biogenic methane production rates in deep marine sediments at Hydrate Ridge, Cascadia margin.

Authors:  F S Colwell; S Boyd; M E Delwiche; D W Reed; T J Phelps; D T Newby
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-03-14       Impact factor: 4.792

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.