AIM: This study evaluated the mortality experience of workers from the styrene-butadiene industry. METHODS: The authors added seven years of follow up to a previous investigation of mortality among 17 924 men employed in the North American synthetic rubber industry. Analyses used the standardised mortality ratios (SMRs) to compare styrene-butadiene rubber workers' cause specific mortality (1943-98) with those of the United States and the Ontario general populations. RESULTS: Overall, the observed/expected numbers of deaths were 6237/7242 for all causes (SMR = 86, 95% CI 84 to 88) and 1608/1741 for all cancers combined (SMR = 92, 95% CI 88 to 97), 71/61 for leukaemia, 53/53 for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, and 26/27 for multiple myeloma. The 16% leukaemia increase was concentrated in hourly paid subjects with 20-29 years since hire and 10 or more years of employment in the industry (19/7.4, SMR = 258, 95% CI 156 to 403) and in subjects employed in polymerisation (18/8.8, SMR = 204, 95% CI 121 to 322), maintenance labour (15/7.4, SMR = 326, 95% CI 178 to 456), and laboratory operations (14/4.3, SMR = 326, 95% CI 178-546). CONCLUSION: The study found that some subgroups of synthetic rubber workers had an excess of mortality from leukaemia that was not limited to a particular form of leukaemia. Uncertainty remains about the specific agent(s) that might be responsible for the observed excesses and about the role of unidentified confounding factors. The study did not find any clear relation between employment in the industry and other forms of lymphohaematopoietic cancer. Some subgroups of subjects had more than expected deaths from colorectal and prostate cancers. These increases did not appear to be related to occupational exposure in the industry.
AIM: This study evaluated the mortality experience of workers from the styrene-butadiene industry. METHODS: The authors added seven years of follow up to a previous investigation of mortality among 17 924 men employed in the North American synthetic rubber industry. Analyses used the standardised mortality ratios (SMRs) to compare styrene-butadiene rubber workers' cause specific mortality (1943-98) with those of the United States and the Ontario general populations. RESULTS: Overall, the observed/expected numbers of deaths were 6237/7242 for all causes (SMR = 86, 95% CI 84 to 88) and 1608/1741 for all cancers combined (SMR = 92, 95% CI 88 to 97), 71/61 for leukaemia, 53/53 for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, and 26/27 for multiple myeloma. The 16% leukaemia increase was concentrated in hourly paid subjects with 20-29 years since hire and 10 or more years of employment in the industry (19/7.4, SMR = 258, 95% CI 156 to 403) and in subjects employed in polymerisation (18/8.8, SMR = 204, 95% CI 121 to 322), maintenance labour (15/7.4, SMR = 326, 95% CI 178 to 456), and laboratory operations (14/4.3, SMR = 326, 95% CI 178-546). CONCLUSION: The study found that some subgroups of synthetic rubber workers had an excess of mortality from leukaemia that was not limited to a particular form of leukaemia. Uncertainty remains about the specific agent(s) that might be responsible for the observed excesses and about the role of unidentified confounding factors. The study did not find any clear relation between employment in the industry and other forms of lymphohaematopoietic cancer. Some subgroups of subjects had more than expected deaths from colorectal and prostate cancers. These increases did not appear to be related to occupational exposure in the industry.
Authors: Joshua T Cohen; Gary Carlson; Gail Charnley; David Coggon; Elizabeth Delzell; John D Graham; Helmut Greim; Daniel Krewski; Michele Medinsky; Richard Monson; Dennis Paustenbach; Barbara Petersen; Stephen Rappaport; Lorenz Rhomberg; P Barry Ryan; Kimberly Thompson Journal: J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev Date: 2002 Jan-Jun Impact factor: 6.393
Authors: N L Harris; E S Jaffe; J Diebold; G Flandrin; H K Muller-Hermelink; J Vardiman; T A Lister; C D Bloomfield Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1999-12 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: R J Albertini; R J Sram; P M Vacek; J Lynch; M Wright; J A Nicklas; P J Boogaard; R F Henderson; J A Swenberg; A D Tates; J B Ward Journal: Chem Biol Interact Date: 2001-06-01 Impact factor: 5.192
Authors: R D Irons; W S Stillman; D W Pyatt; Y Yang; A Le; D L Gustafson; J Hua Zheng Journal: Chem Biol Interact Date: 2001-06-01 Impact factor: 5.192
Authors: Sara Karami; Paolo Boffetta; Paul Brennan; Patricia A Stewart; David Zaridze; Vsevolod Matveev; Vladimir Janout; Helena Kollarova; Vladimir Bencko; Marie Navratilova; Neonila Szeszenia-Dabrowska; Dana Mates; Jan P Gromiec; Roman Sobotka; Wong-Ho Chow; Nathaniel Rothman; Lee E Moore Journal: J Occup Environ Med Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 2.162
Authors: Elizabeth M Ward; Paul A Schulte; Kurt Straif; Nancy B Hopf; Jane C Caldwell; Tania Carreón; David M DeMarini; Bruce A Fowler; Bernard D Goldstein; Kari Hemminki; Cynthia J Hines; Kirsti Husgafvel Pursiainen; Eileen Kuempel; Joellen Lewtas; Ruth M Lunn; Elsebeth Lynge; Damien M McElvenny; Hartwig Muhle; Tamie Nakajima; Larry W Robertson; Nathaniel Rothman; Avima M Ruder; Mary K Schubauer-Berigan; Jack Siemiatycki; Debra Silverman; Martyn T Smith; Tom Sorahan; Kyle Steenland; Richard G Stevens; Paolo Vineis; Shelia Hoar Zahm; Lauren Zeise; Vincent J Cogliano Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2010-06-18 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Jeffrey K Wickliffe; Marinel M Ammenheuser; P Jene Adler; Sherif Z Abdel-Rahman; Jonathan B Ward Journal: Environ Mol Mutagen Date: 2009-03 Impact factor: 3.216
Authors: Dewakar Sangaraju; Peter Villalta; Melissa Goggin; Maria O Agunsoye; Colin Campbell; Natalia Tretyakova Journal: Chem Res Toxicol Date: 2013-09-12 Impact factor: 3.739
Authors: Amanda Degner; Rashi Arora; Luke Erber; Christopher Chao; Lisa A Peterson; Natalia Y Tretyakova Journal: Chem Res Toxicol Date: 2020-04-15 Impact factor: 3.739