Literature DB >> 16298920

The impact of latency on surgical precision and task completion during robotic-assisted remote telepresence surgery.

Mehran Anvari1, Tim Broderick, Harvey Stein, Trevor Chapman, Moji Ghodoussi, Daniel W Birch, Craig McKinley, Patrick Trudeau, Sanjeev Dutta, Charles H Goldsmith.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: It has been suggested that robotic-assisted remote telepresence surgery with a signal transmission latency of greater than 300 ms may not be possible.
METHODS: We evaluated the impact of four different latencies of up to 500 ms on task completion and error rate in five surgeons after completion of three different surgical tasks.
RESULTS: The surgeons were able to complete all tasks with a latency of 500 ms. However, higher latency was associated with higher error rates and task completion time (TCT). There were significant variations between surgeons and different tasks.
CONCLUSION: Surgeons are able to complete tasks with a signal transmission latency of up to 500 ms. The clinical impact of slower TCT and increased error rates encountered at higher latency needs to be established.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16298920     DOI: 10.3109/10929080500228654

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Aided Surg        ISSN: 1092-9088


  14 in total

Review 1.  A comprehensive review of telementoring applications in laparoscopic general surgery.

Authors:  Stavros A Antoniou; George A Antoniou; Jan Franzen; Stefan Bollmann; Oliver O Koch; Rudolf Pointner; Frank A Granderath
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Telementoring and telerobotics in urological surgery.

Authors:  Ben Challacombe; Sarah Wheatstone
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Telesurgical evaluation of stable thoracic trauma patients: a feasibility study.

Authors:  P D Bhatia; D A Bottoni; R A Malthaner
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2011-03-25       Impact factor: 3.693

4.  Robot-assisted airway support: a simulated case.

Authors:  Patrick J Tighe; S J Badiyan; I Luria; S Lampotang; S Parekattil
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 5.108

Review 5.  Telemedicine in Surgery: What are the Opportunities and Hurdles to Realising the Potential?

Authors:  Nicholas Raison; Muhammad Shamim Khan; Ben Challacombe
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 3.092

6.  Determination of the latency effects on surgical performance and the acceptable latency levels in telesurgery using the dV-Trainer(®) simulator.

Authors:  Song Xu; Manuela Perez; Kun Yang; Cyril Perrenot; Jacques Felblinger; Jacques Hubert
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  Teleconsulting in the time of a global pandemic: Application to anesthesia and technological considerations.

Authors:  Daniel S J Pang; Jessica M Pang; Opal-Jane Payne; Frazer M Clement; Terrie Faber
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 1.008

Review 8.  Remote telepresence surgery: the Canadian experience.

Authors:  M Anvari
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-02-06       Impact factor: 3.453

9.  Low-Latency Teleoperations, Planetary Protection, and Astrobiology.

Authors:  Mark Lupisella; Margaret S Race
Journal:  Int J Astrobiol       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 1.358

10.  Augmented Reality as a Telemedicine Platform for Remote Procedural Training.

Authors:  Shiyao Wang; Michael Parsons; Jordan Stone-McLean; Peter Rogers; Sarah Boyd; Kristopher Hoover; Oscar Meruvia-Pastor; Minglun Gong; Andrew Smith
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 3.576

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.