Literature DB >> 16298852

How plate positioning impacts the biomechanics of the open wedge tibial osteotomy; a finite element analysis.

L D Blecha1, P Y Zambelli, N A Ramaniraka, P-E Bourban, J-A Månson, D P Pioletti.   

Abstract

A numerical model of the medial open wedge tibial osteotomy based on the finite element method was developed. Two plate positions were tested numerically. In a configuration, (a), the plate was fixed in a medial position and (b) in an anteromedial position. The simulation took into account soft tissues preload, muscular tonus and maximal gait load.The maximal stresses observed in the four structural elements (bone, plate, wedge, screws) of an osteotomy with plate in medial position were substantially higher (1.13-2.8 times more) than those observed in osteotomy with an anteromedial plate configuration. An important increase (1.71 times more) of the relative micromotions between the wedge and the bone was also observed. In order to avoid formation of fibrous tissue at the bone wedge interface, the osteotomy should be loaded under 18.8% (approximately 50 kg) of the normal gait load until the osteotomy interfaces union is achieved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16298852     DOI: 10.1080/10255840500322433

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin        ISSN: 1025-5842            Impact factor:   1.763


  10 in total

Review 1.  Biomechanics and tissue engineering.

Authors:  D P Pioletti
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 2.  Bone tissue engineering: recent advances and challenges.

Authors:  Ami R Amini; Cato T Laurencin; Syam P Nukavarapu
Journal:  Crit Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2012

3.  Is a Complete Anatomical Fit of the Tomofix Plate Biomechanically Favorable? A Parametric Study Using the Finite Element Method.

Authors:  Zahra Hayatbakhsh; Farzam Farahmand; Morad Karimpour
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2022-08

4.  Finite element analysis of osteosynthesis screw fixation in the bone stock: an appropriate method for automatic screw modelling.

Authors:  Jan Wieding; Robert Souffrant; Andreas Fritsche; Wolfram Mittelmeier; Rainer Bader
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Static and fatigue strength of a novel anatomically contoured implant compared to five current open-wedge high tibial osteotomy plates.

Authors:  Arnaud Diffo Kaze; Stefan Maas; James Belsey; Alexander Hoffmann; Dietrich Pape
Journal:  J Exp Orthop       Date:  2017-12-08

6.  Clinical Experience Using a 3D-Printed Patient-Specific Instrument for Medial Opening Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy.

Authors:  Jesse Chieh-Szu Yang; Cheng-Fong Chen; Chu-An Luo; Ming-Chau Chang; Oscar K Lee; Ye Huang; Shang-Chih Lin
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Numerical comparative study of five currently used implants for high tibial osteotomy: realistic loading including muscle forces versus simplified experimental loading.

Authors:  Arnaud Diffo Kaze; Stefan Maas; Slawomir Kedziora; James Belsey; Alexander Haupert; Claude Wolf; Alexander Hoffmann; Dietrich Pape
Journal:  J Exp Orthop       Date:  2018-08-08

8.  Stress and stability comparison between different systems for high tibial osteotomies.

Authors:  Chu-An Luo; Shi-Yuan Hua; Shang-Chih Lin; Chun-Ming Chen; Ching-Shiow Tseng
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2013-03-25       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  Placement-induced effects on high tibial osteotomized construct - biomechanical tests and finite-element analyses.

Authors:  Chu-An Luo; Su-Yang Hwa; Shang-Chih Lin; Chun-Ming Chen; Ching-Shiow Tseng
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Stress and stability of plate-screw fixation and screw fixation in the treatment of Schatzker type IV medial tibial plateau fracture: a comparative finite element study.

Authors:  Xiaowei Huang; Zhongzheng Zhi; Baoqing Yu; Fancheng Chen
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 2.359

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.