BACKGROUND: The influence of heart rate on detectability and reproducibility of multislice computed tomography (MSCT) for measuring coronary calcium score was evaluated using pulsating calcified mock-vessels and compared with electron beam tomography (EBT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four calcified mock-vessels with 200-350 HU were made to pulsate at a rate of 40-80 beat/min. Retrospective ECG-gating MSCT (Light Speed Ultra 16) scanning with 0.625 mm slice-thickness was performed twice at each pulsation rate. For comparison, EBT (Imatron C150 XP) was performed with 3 and 1.5 mm beam collimation with prospective ECG-gating and calcium scores were measured. RESULTS: The comparison revealed that MSCT did not have better reproducibility than EBT, but the calcium scores with MSCT were less influenced by pulsation rates than those with EBT. Especially in mild calcification, the calcium scores decreased with EBT with 3 mm beam collimation with increasing pulsation rate, but the scores were stable in any rate with MSCT. CONCLUSION: MSCT effectively detects coronary calcification, especially mild calcification, without being influenced by heart rate. This is accomplished by reducing the partial volume effect in the through plane using sub millimeter slice thickness, and using appropriate reconstruction methods, which improve temporal resolution.
BACKGROUND: The influence of heart rate on detectability and reproducibility of multislice computed tomography (MSCT) for measuring coronary calcium score was evaluated using pulsating calcified mock-vessels and compared with electron beam tomography (EBT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four calcified mock-vessels with 200-350 HU were made to pulsate at a rate of 40-80 beat/min. Retrospective ECG-gating MSCT (Light Speed Ultra 16) scanning with 0.625 mm slice-thickness was performed twice at each pulsation rate. For comparison, EBT (Imatron C150 XP) was performed with 3 and 1.5 mm beam collimation with prospective ECG-gating and calcium scores were measured. RESULTS: The comparison revealed that MSCT did not have better reproducibility than EBT, but the calcium scores with MSCT were less influenced by pulsation rates than those with EBT. Especially in mild calcification, the calcium scores decreased with EBT with 3 mm beam collimation with increasing pulsation rate, but the scores were stable in any rate with MSCT. CONCLUSION: MSCT effectively detects coronary calcification, especially mild calcification, without being influenced by heart rate. This is accomplished by reducing the partial volume effect in the through plane using sub millimeter slice thickness, and using appropriate reconstruction methods, which improve temporal resolution.
Authors: Wisnumurti Kristanto; Peter M A van Ooijen; Jaap M Groen; Rozemarijn Vliegenthart; Matthijs Oudkerk Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2011-04-21 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Niels R van der Werf; Margo van Gent; Ronald Booij; Daniel Bos; Aad van der Lugt; Ricardo P J Budde; Marcel J W Greuter; Marcel van Straten Journal: Diagnostics (Basel) Date: 2021-11-25