Literature DB >> 1629757

Activity of single neurons in the monkey amygdala during performance of a visual discrimination task.

K Nakamura1, A Mikami, K Kubota.   

Abstract

1. The activity of single neurons was recorded extracellularly from the monkey amygdala while monkeys performed a visual discrimination task. The monkeys were trained to remember a visual stimulus during a delay period (0.5-3.0 s), to discriminate a new visual stimulus from the stimulus, and to release a lever when the new stimulus was presented. Colored photographs (human faces, monkeys, foods, and nonfood objects) or computer-generated two-dimensional shapes (a yellow triangle, a red circle, etc.) were used as visual stimuli. 2. The activity of 160 task-related neurons was studied. Of these, 144 (90%) responded to visual stimuli, 13 (8%) showed firing during the delay period, and 9 (6%) responded to the reward. 3. Task-related neurons were categorized according to the way in which various stimuli activated the neurons. First, to evaluate the proportion of all tested stimuli that elicited changes in activity of a neuron, selectivity index 1 (SI1) was employed. Second, to evaluate the ability of a neuron to discriminate a stimulus from another stimulus, SI2 was employed. On the basis of the calculated values of SI1 and SI2, neurons were classified as selective and nonselective. Most visual neurons were categorized as selective (131/144), and a few were characterized as nonselective (13/144). Neurons active during the delay period were also categorized as selective visual and delay neurons (6/13) and as nonselective delay neurons (7/13). 4. Responses of selective visual neurons had various temporal and stimulus-selective properties. Latencies ranged widely from 60 to 300 ms. Response durations also ranged widely from 20 to 870 ms. When the natures of the various effective stimuli were studied for each neuron, one-fourth of the responses of these neurons were considered to reflect some categorical aspect of the stimuli, such as human, monkey, food, or nonfood object. Furthermore, the responses of some neurons apparently reflected a certain behavioral significance of the stimuli that was separate from the task, such as the face of a particular person, smiling human faces, etc. 5. Nonselective visual neurons responded to a visual stimulus, regardless of its nature. They also responded in the absence of a visual stimulus when the monkey anticipated the appearance of the next stimulus. 6. Selective visual and delay neurons fired in response to particular stimuli and throughout the subsequent delay periods. Nonselective delay neurons increased their discharge rates gradually during the delay period, and the discharge rate decreased after the next stimulus was presented. 7. Task-related neurons were identified in six histologically distinct nuclei of the amygdala.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1629757     DOI: 10.1152/jn.1992.67.6.1447

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  30 in total

1.  Visually guided facial actions in rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  A Izumi; K Kuraoka; S Kojima; K Nakamura
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  The social evaluation of faces: a meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies.

Authors:  Peter Mende-Siedlecki; Christopher P Said; Alexander Todorov
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  Fearful expressions gain preferential access to awareness during continuous flash suppression.

Authors:  Eunice Yang; David H Zald; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2007-11

4.  Flexible neural representations of value in the primate brain.

Authors:  C Daniel Salzman; Joseph J Paton; Marina A Belova; Sara E Morrison
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2007-09-13       Impact factor: 5.691

Review 5.  The primate amygdala in social perception - insights from electrophysiological recordings and stimulation.

Authors:  Ueli Rutishauser; Adam N Mamelak; Ralph Adolphs
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2015-04-03       Impact factor: 13.837

6.  Medial temporal lobe coding of item and spatial information during relational binding in working memory.

Authors:  Laura A Libby; Deborah E Hannula; Charan Ranganath
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Multisensory Neurons in the Primate Amygdala.

Authors:  Jeremiah Morrow; Clayton Mosher; Katalin Gothard
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Bidirectional electric communication between the inferior occipital gyrus and the amygdala during face processing.

Authors:  Wataru Sato; Takanori Kochiyama; Shota Uono; Kazumi Matsuda; Keiko Usui; Naotaka Usui; Yushi Inoue; Motomi Toichi
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 9.  Seeing the invisible: the scope and limits of unconscious processing in binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Zhicheng Lin; Sheng He
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2008-09-07       Impact factor: 11.685

10.  Emotion and attention effects: is it all a matter of timing? Not yet.

Authors:  Luiz Pessoa
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.