Literature DB >> 16296684

Acceptability and compliance with wearing energy-shunting hip protectors: a 6-month prospective follow-up in a Finnish nursing home.

J Parkkari1, J Heikkilä, I P Kannus.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the acceptability and compliance with use of an energy-shunting hip protector in institutionalized elderly people. DESIGN AND
SETTING: A 6 month prospective follow-up in a Finnish nursing home. PARTICIPANTS: 19 ambulatory nursing home residents with a high risk of hip fracture. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The proportion of the residents who were willing to use the device, the number of hours of wearing the protector and the attitudes of the study subjects and the caregivers towards the appearance, comfort, fit, efficacy and laundering of the protector.
RESULTS: 12 of the 19 ambulatory residents (63%) agreed to use the protector. During the study period, these subjects wore the protector on average for more than 90% of their active days, i.e. the days they were mobile. Two subjects wore the protectors at night time; the rest only during waking hours. Mean wearing time during waking hours exceeded 90%.
CONCLUSION: External hip joint protectors are a feasible strategy to prevent hip fractures in institutionalized elderly people. The attitude, education and motivation of the staff may be a factor in achieving good user compliance. Further community-based studies on acceptability and compliance in wearing external hip joint protectors are needed for verification of benefits to the general population of older people.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 16296684     DOI: 10.1093/ageing/27.2.225

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Age Ageing        ISSN: 0002-0729            Impact factor:   10.668


  8 in total

1.  Hip protectors.

Authors:  Ian D Cameron
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-02-16

2.  Do hip pads help prevent hip fractures?

Authors:  C Rivet
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 3.  Adherence with hip protectors: a proposal for standardised definitions.

Authors:  S E Kurrle; I D Cameron; S Quine; R G Cumming
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-10-31       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Compliance with external hip protectors in nursing homes in Norway.

Authors:  L Forsén; S Sandvig; A Schuller; A J Søgaard
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.399

5.  Compliance of external hip protector use amongst elderly day hospital attenders.

Authors:  C W Fan; K M Tan; D Coakley; J B Walsh; C Cunningham
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2005 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.568

6.  Hip protector compliance among older people living in residential care homes.

Authors:  C Cryer; A Knox; D Martin; J Barlow
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.399

7.  Quantitative measurement of hip protector use and compliance.

Authors:  Katherine R Evans; Edmond Lou; Chris Woloschuk; Doug Hill; Meng Li; Man-Sang Wong
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2013-09-15       Impact factor: 2.602

8.  Effect on hip fractures of increased use of hip protectors in nursing homes: cluster randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Gabriele Meyer; Andrea Warnke; R Bender; I Mühlhauser
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-01-11
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.