Literature DB >> 15868890

Compliance of external hip protector use amongst elderly day hospital attenders.

C W Fan1, K M Tan, D Coakley, J B Walsh, C Cunningham.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: When worn external Hip Protectors (EHP) reduce hip fracture but poor compliance results in reduced efficacy. AIMS: We determined the compliance with EHP therapy among a group of elderly people attending a day hospital.
METHODS: Forty-five patients or their care-givers were interviewed a mean (sd) 334 (150) days after they had been given EHP.
RESULTS: There were 12 men and 33 women with mean age of 80 (7) years. Only ten (22%) were still wearing EHP properly. Those who were compliant were given their EHP more recently than those who were not (277 (118) days vs 403 (159), p = 0.0062) and were more likely to feel safer when wearing them (p = 00.017, chi2= 5.68). Reasons for non-compliance included exclusive outdoor wear, discomfort and inconvenience.
CONCLUSIONS: Hip protector compliance was poor in this small study of elderly individuals attending a day hospital. Better patient education may improve compliance though this needs to be determined.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15868890     DOI: 10.1007/bf03168519

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ir J Med Sci        ISSN: 0021-1265            Impact factor:   1.568


  23 in total

1.  Acceptability and compliance with wearing energy-shunting hip protectors: a 6-month prospective follow-up in a Finnish nursing home.

Authors:  J Parkkari; J Heikkilä; I P Kannus
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 10.668

2.  Hip fracture prevention trial using hip protectors in Japanese nursing homes.

Authors:  A Harada; M Mizuno; M Takemura; H Tokuda; H Okuizumi; N Niino
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Hip protectors in aged-care facilities: a randomized trial of use by individual higher-risk residents.

Authors:  I D Cameron; J Venman; S E Kurrle; K Lockwood; C Birks; R G Cumming; S Quine; G Bashford
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 10.668

4.  A hypothesis: the causes of hip fractures.

Authors:  S R Cummings; M C Nevitt
Journal:  J Gerontol       Date:  1989-07

5.  Hip protectors improve falls self-efficacy.

Authors:  I D Cameron; B Stafford; R G Cumming; C Birks; S E Kurrle; K Lockwood; S Quine; T Finnegan; G Salkeld
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 10.668

6.  Acceptance of hip protectors for hip fracture prevention in nursing homes.

Authors:  M Hubacher; A Wettstein
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Impact near the hip dominates fracture risk in elderly nursing home residents who fall.

Authors:  W C Hayes; E R Myers; J N Morris; T N Gerhart; H S Yett; L A Lipsitz
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 4.333

8.  Randomized controlled trial of hip protectors among women living in the community.

Authors:  Yvonne F Birks; Jill Porthouse; Caroline Addie; Karen Loughney; Lucy Saxon; Mike Baverstock; Roger M Francis; David M Reid; Ian Watt; David J Torgerson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-03-03       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  A comparative study of rehabilitation outcomes of elderly hip fracture patients: the advantage of a comprehensive orthogeriatric approach.

Authors:  Abraham Adunsky; Ayala Lusky; Marina Arad; Raphael J Heruti
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 6.053

10.  Time trends and demography of mortality after fractured neck of femur in an English population, 1968-98: database study.

Authors:  Stephen E Roberts; Michael J Goldacre
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-10-04
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  [The role of hip protectors in the prevention of hip fractures in older people].

Authors:  Lukas A Holzer; Gerold Holzer
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2007
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.