Literature DB >> 16295244

Unilateral versus bilateral amplification for adults with impaired hearing.

Therese C Walden1, Brian E Walden.   

Abstract

This study compared unilateral and bilateral aided speech recognition in background noise in 28 patients being fitted with amplification. Aided QuickSIN (Quick Speech-in-Noise test) scores were obtained for bilateral amplification and for unilateral amplification in each ear. In addition, right-ear directed and left-ear directed recall on the Dichotic Digits Test (DDT) was obtained from each participant. Results revealed that the vast majority of patients obtained better speech recognition in background noise on the QuickSIN from unilateral amplification than from bilateral amplification. There was a greater tendency for bilateral amplification to have a deleterious effect among older patients. Most frequently, better aided QuickSIN performance was obtained in the right ear of participants, despite similar hearing thresholds in both ears. Finally, patients tended to perform better on the DDT in the ear that provided less SNR loss on the QuickSIN. Results suggest that bilateral amplification may not always be beneficial in every daily listening environment when background noise is present, and it may be advisable for patients wearing bilateral amplification to remove one hearing aid when difficulty is encountered understanding speech in background noise.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16295244     DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.16.8.6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol        ISSN: 1050-0545            Impact factor:   1.664


  15 in total

1.  Two Ears Are Not Always Better than One: Mandatory Vowel Fusion Across Spectrally Mismatched Ears in Hearing-Impaired Listeners.

Authors:  Lina A J Reiss; Jessica L Eggleston; Emily P Walker; Yonghee Oh
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-05-24

2.  Contralateral Interference Caused by Binaurally Presented Competing Speech in Adult Bilateral Cochlear-Implant Users.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Olga A Stakhovskaya; Joshua G W Bernstein
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Central auditory dysfunction as a harbinger of Alzheimer dementia.

Authors:  George A Gates; Melissa L Anderson; Susan M McCurry; M Patrick Feeney; Eric B Larson
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2011-04

4.  Hearing Aid Technology Settings and Speech-in-Noise Difficulties.

Authors:  Alyssa Davidson; Nicole Marrone; Pamela Souza
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 1.636

Review 5.  The design of a project to assess bilateral versus unilateral hearing aid fitting.

Authors:  Stig Arlinger; Stuart Gatehouse; Jürgen Kiessling; Graham Naylor; Hans Verschuure; Jan Wouters
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2008-06

6.  Formal auditory training in adult hearing aid users.

Authors:  Daniela Gil; Maria Cecília Martinelli Iorio
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.365

7.  Evaluating the benefit of hearing aids in solving the cocktail party problem.

Authors:  Nicole Marrone; Christine R Mason; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2008-12

8.  Advantages of binaural amplification to acceptable noise level of directional hearing aid users.

Authors:  Ja-Hee Kim; Jae Hee Lee; Ho-Ki Lee
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 3.372

9.  Overview of Central Auditory Processing Deficits in Older Adults.

Authors:  Samuel R Atcherson; Naveen K Nagaraj; Sarah E W Kennett; Meredith Levisee
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2015-08

10.  Dichotic listening performance with cochlear-implant simulations of ear asymmetry is consistent with difficulty ignoring clearer speech.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Daniel Eisenberg; Kristina DeRoy Milvae
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 2.157

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.