Literature DB >> 16295234

Effectiveness of directional microphones and noise reduction schemes in hearing aids: a systematic review of the evidence.

Ruth A Bentler1.   

Abstract

A systematic review of the literature was undertaken to find evidence of real-world effectiveness of directional microphone and digital noise reduction features in current hearing aids. The evidence was drawn from randomized controlled trials, nonrandomized intervention studies, and descriptive studies. The quality of each study was evaluated for factors such as blinding, power of statistical analyses, and use of psychometrically strong outcome measures. Weaknesses in the identified studies included small sample size, resultant poor power to detect potentially worthwhile differences, and overlapping experimental conditions. Nine studies were identified for directional microphones, and the evidence (albeit weak) supports effectiveness. Two studies were identified for the noise reduction feature, and the evidence was equivocal. For the researcher, such a systematic review should encourage the careful consideration of appropriate methodologies for assessing feature effectiveness. For the clinician, the outcomes reported herein should encourage use of such a systematic review to drive clinical practice.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16295234     DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.16.7.7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol        ISSN: 1050-0545            Impact factor:   1.664


  42 in total

1.  Dispensing rates of four common hearing aid product features: associations with variations in practice among audiologists.

Authors:  Earl E Johnson; Todd A Ricketts
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2010-05-10

2.  A method to remove differences in frequency response between commercial hearing aids to allow direct comparison of the sound quality of hearing-aid features.

Authors:  Rolph Houben; Inge Brons; Wouter A Dreschler
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2011-11-07

3.  The effects of digital noise reduction on the acceptance of background noise.

Authors:  H Gustav Mueller; Jennifer Weber; Benjamin W Y Hornsby
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2006-06

Review 4.  Digital noise reduction: an overview.

Authors:  Ruth Bentler; Li-Kuei Chiou
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2006-06

5.  Digital hearing AIDS from the perspective of one consumer/audiologist.

Authors:  Mark Ross
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2007-03

6.  Feasibility of ecological momentary assessment of hearing difficulties encountered by hearing aid users.

Authors:  Gino Galvez; Mitchel B Turbin; Emily J Thielman; Joseph A Istvan; Judy A Andrews; James A Henry
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 7.  Adult aural rehabilitation: what is it and does it work?

Authors:  Arthur Boothroyd
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2007-06

8.  Development and efficacy of a frequent-word auditory training protocol for older adults with impaired hearing.

Authors:  Larry E Humes; Matthew H Burk; Lauren E Strauser; Dana L Kinney
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Adaptive spatial filtering improves speech reception in noise while preserving binaural cues.

Authors:  Susan R S Bissmeyer; Raymond L Goldsworthy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Benefit From Directional Microphone Hearing Aids: Objective and Subjective Evaluations.

Authors:  Hee-Sung Park; Il Joon Moon; Sun Hwa Jin; Ji Eun Choi; Yang-Sun Cho; Sung Hwa Hong
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 3.372

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.