Literature DB >> 1629490

Acoustic and perceptual characteristics of voicing in fricatives and fricative clusters.

K N Stevens1, S E Blumstein, L Glicksman, M Burton, K Kurowski.   

Abstract

Several types of measurements were made to determine the acoustic characteristics that distinguish between voiced and voiceless fricatives in various phonetic environments. The selection of measurements was based on a theoretical analysis that indicated the acoustic and aerodynamic attributes at the boundaries between fricatives and vowels. As expected, glottal vibration extended over a longer time in the obstruent interval for voiced fricatives than for voiceless fricatives, and there were more extensive transitions of the first formant adjacent to voiced fricatives than for the voiceless cognates. When two fricatives with different voicing were adjacent, there were substantial modifications of these acoustic attributes, particularly for the syllable-final fricative. In some cases, these modifications leads to complete assimilation of the voicing feature. Several perceptual studies with synthetic vowel-consonant-vowel stimuli and with edited natural stimuli examined the role of consonant duration, extent and location of glottal vibration, and extent of formant transitions on the identification of the voicing characteristics of fricatives. The perceptual results were in general consistent with the acoustic observations and with expectations based on the theoretical model. The results suggest that listeners base their voicing judgments of intervocalic fricatives on an assessment of the time interval in the fricative during which there is no glottal vibration. This time interval must exceed about 60 ms if the fricative is to be judged as voiceless, except that a small correction to this threshold is applied depending on the extent to which the first-formant transitions are truncated at the consonant boundaries.

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1629490     DOI: 10.1121/1.402933

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  12 in total

1.  A psychoacoustic method for studying the necessary and sufficient perceptual cues of American English fricative consonants in noise.

Authors:  Feipeng Li; Andrea Trevino; Anjali Menon; Jont B Allen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Durational cues to fricative codas in 2-year-olds' American English: voicing and morphemic factors.

Authors:  Jae Yung Song; Katherine Demuth; Karen Evans; Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Dynamic hyperarticulation of coda voicing contrasts.

Authors:  Scott Seyfarth; Esteban Buz; T Florian Jaeger
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Individual sensitivity to spectral and temporal cues in listeners with hearing impairment.

Authors:  Pamela E Souza; Richard A Wright; Michael C Blackburn; Rachael Tatman; Frederick J Gallun
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  What information is necessary for speech categorization? Harnessing variability in the speech signal by integrating cues computed relative to expectations.

Authors:  Bob McMurray; Allard Jongman
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Acoustic evidence for positional and complexity effects on children's production of plural -s.

Authors:  Rachel M Theodore; Katherine Demuth; Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Inherent emotional quality of human speech sounds.

Authors:  Blake Myers-Schulz; Maia Pujara; Richard C Wolf; Michael Koenigs
Journal:  Cogn Emot       Date:  2013-01-03

8.  Phonetic basis of phonemic paraphasias in aphasia: Evidence for cascading activation.

Authors:  Kathleen Kurowski; Sheila E Blumstein
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2015-12-31       Impact factor: 4.027

9.  The use of acoustic cues for phonetic identification: effects of spectral degradation and electric hearing.

Authors:  Matthew B Winn; Monita Chatterjee; William J Idsardi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.482

10.  Evidence for the role of German final devoicing in pre-attentive speech processing: a mismatch negativity study.

Authors:  Hubert Truckenbrodt; Johanna Steinberg; Thomas K Jacobsen; Thomas Jacobsen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-11-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.