Literature DB >> 16293863

Phase III trial of epirubicin plus paclitaxel compared with epirubicin plus cyclophosphamide as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer: United Kingdom National Cancer Research Institute trial AB01.

Ruth E Langley1, James Carmichael, Alison L Jones, David A Cameron, Wendi Qian, Barbara Uscinska, Anthony Howell, Mahesh Parmar.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the effectiveness and tolerability of epirubicin and paclitaxel (EP) with epirubicin and cyclophosphamide (EC) as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer (MBC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients previously untreated with chemotherapy (except for adjuvant therapy) were randomly assigned to receive either EP (epirubicin 75 mg/m2 and paclitaxel 200 mg/m2) or EC (epirubicin 75 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2) administered intravenously every 3 weeks for a maximum of six cycles. The primary outcome was progression-free survival; secondary outcome measures were overall survival, response rates, and toxicity.
RESULTS: Between 1996 and 1999, 705 patients (353 EP patients and 352 EC patients) underwent random assignment. Patient characteristics were well matched between the two groups, and 71% of patients received six cycles of treatment. Objective response rates were 65% for the EP group and 55% for the EC group (P = .015). At the time of analysis, 641 patients (91%) had died. Median progression-free survival time was 7.0 months for the EP group and 7.1 months for the EC group (hazard ratio = 1.07; 95% CI, 0.92 to 1.24; P = .41), and median overall survival time was 13 months for the EP group and 14 months for the EC group (hazard ratio = 1.02; 95% CI, 0.87 to 1.19; P = .8). EP patients, compared with EC patients, had more grade 3 and 4 mucositis (6% v 2%, respectively; P = .0006) and grade 3 and 4 neurotoxicity (5% v 1%, respectively; P < .0001).
CONCLUSION: In terms of progression-free survival and overall survival, there was no evidence of a difference between EP and EC. The data demonstrate no additional advantage to using EP instead of EC as first-line chemotherapy for MBC in taxane-naïve patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16293863     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.01.1817

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  9 in total

Review 1.  Rechallenging with anthracyclines and taxanes in metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Carlo Palmieri; Jonathan Krell; Colin R James; Catherine Harper-Wynne; Vivek Misra; Susan Cleator; David Miles
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-08-31       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 2.  Filling in the gaps: reporting of concurrent supportive care therapies in breast cancer chemotherapy trials.

Authors:  Orit Freedman; Eitan Amir; Camilla Zimmermann; Mark Clemons
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2011-01-04       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 3.  Taxane-containing regimens for metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Davina Ghersi; Melina L Willson; Matthew Ming Ki Chan; John Simes; Emma Donoghue; Nicholas Wilcken
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-06-10

4.  Sequential docetaxel as adjuvant chemotherapy for node-positive or/and T3 or T4 breast cancer: clinical outcome (Mansoura University).

Authors:  H Sakr; R H Hamed; A H Anter; T Yossef
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 3.064

5.  Progression-free survival as a surrogate endpoint in advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  Rebecca A Miksad; Vera Zietemann; Raffaella Gothe; Ruth Schwarzer; Annette Conrads-Frank; Petra Schnell-Inderst; Björn Stollenwerk; Uwe Siebert
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.188

6.  Role of taxane and anthracycline combination regimens in the management of advanced breast cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Authors:  Ruinian Zheng; Shuai Han; Chongyang Duan; Kexu Chen; Zhijian You; Jun Jia; Shunhuan Lin; Liming Liang; Aixue Liu; Huidong Long; Senming Wang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.889

7.  Quality of adverse event reporting in phase III randomized controlled trials of breast and colorectal cancer: A systematic review.

Authors:  Adam S Komorowski; Helen J MacKay; Rossanna C Pezo
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 4.452

8.  Drug resistance and the role of combination chemotherapy in improving patient outcomes.

Authors:  Denise A Yardley
Journal:  Int J Breast Cancer       Date:  2013-06-24

Review 9.  Incorporating clinical trial data into daily cancer care.

Authors:  Jody Pelusi
Journal:  J Adv Pract Oncol       Date:  2012-11
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.