Literature DB >> 16293328

Validation of a commercially available cELISA test for canine neosporosis against an indirect fluorescent antibody test (IFAT).

Gioia Capelli1, Alda Natale, Stefano Nardelli, Antonio Frangipane di Regalbono, Mario Pietrobelli.   

Abstract

A commercially available competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (cELISA, VMRD) was validated for the detection of Neospora caninum antibodies in the serum of dogs, using as a reference test an indirect fluorescent antibody test (IFAT, Fuller). A partial verification approach was used. A total of 618 dogs were screened with cELISA and a subset of positive and negative sera (n=237) were then tested with IFAT. Naïve relative sensitivity (SE(nv)) and naïve relative specificity (SP(nv)) of cELISA were calculated and then corrected (SE(corr); SP(corr)) for studies with partial validation. Results showed a SE(nv) of 72% and a SP(nv) of 89.3%; corrected estimates showed a SE(corr) of 47% and a SP(corr) of 96%. ROC analysis showed that the cutoff recommended by the manufacturer (30%) corresponded to the highest naïve sensitivity (72%) combined with a good naïve specificity (90%) of cELISA. Corrected estimates of SE and SP for partial verification method revealed that SE of the cELISA is lower and SP is higher than naïve estimates. The results suggest to use this test for confirmation of a clinical suspicion of neosporosis, and to use some techniques for adjustment of misclassification in prevalence and risk-factor studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16293328     DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2005.10.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Vet Med        ISSN: 0167-5877            Impact factor:   2.670


  4 in total

1.  Risk factors of Neospora caninum infection in dogs and cats in dairy farms in Western Thailand.

Authors:  Pipat Arunvipas; Tawin Inpankaew; Sathaporn Jittapalapong
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 1.559

2.  Diagnostic test evaluation methodology: A systematic review of methods employed to evaluate diagnostic tests in the absence of gold standard - An update.

Authors:  Chinyereugo M Umemneku Chikere; Kevin Wilson; Sara Graziadio; Luke Vale; A Joy Allen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Estimating Neospora caninum prevalence in wildlife populations using Bayesian inference.

Authors:  Karla Moreno-Torres; Barbara Wolfe; William Saville; Rebecca Garabed
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 2.912

4.  High seroprevalance of Neospora caninum in dogs in Victoria, Australia, compared to 20 years ago.

Authors:  Sarah Sloan; Jan Šlapeta; Abdul Jabbar; Jaimie Hunnam; Bert De Groef; Grant Rawlin; Christina McCowan
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 3.876

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.