Literature DB >> 16292613

Surrogate docking: structure-based virtual screening at high throughput speed.

Sukjoon Yoon1, Andrew Smellie, David Hartsough, Anton Filikov.   

Abstract

Structure-based screening using fully flexible docking is still too slow for large molecular libraries. High quality docking of a million molecule library can take days even on a cluster with hundreds of CPUs. This performance issue prohibits the use of fully flexible docking in the design of large combinatorial libraries. We have developed a fast structure-based screening method, which utilizes docking of a limited number of compounds to build a 2D QSAR model used to rapidly score the rest of the database. We compare here a model based on radial basis functions and a Bayesian categorization model. The number of compounds that need to be actually docked depends on the number of docking hits found. In our case studies reasonable quality models are built after docking of the number of molecules containing approximately 50 docking hits. The rest of the library is screened by the QSAR model. Optionally a fraction of the QSAR-prioritized library can be docked in order to find the true docking hits. The quality of the model only depends on the training set size - not on the size of the library to be screened. Therefore, for larger libraries the method yields higher gain in speed no change in performance. Prioritizing a large library with these models provides a significant enrichment with docking hits: it attains the values of approximately 13 and approximately 35 at the beginning of the score-sorted libraries in our two case studies: screening of the NCI collection and a combinatorial libraries on CDK2 kinase structure. With such enrichments, only a fraction of the database must actually be docked to find many of the true hits. The throughput of the method allows its use in screening of large compound collections and in the design of large combinatorial libraries. The strategy proposed has an important effect on efficiency but does not affect retrieval of actives, the latter being determined by the quality of the docking method itself.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16292613     DOI: 10.1007/s10822-005-9002-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des        ISSN: 0920-654X            Impact factor:   3.686


  26 in total

1.  DREAM++: flexible docking program for virtual combinatorial libraries.

Authors:  S Makino; T J Ewing; I D Kuntz
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  Nearest neighbor search in general metric spaces using a tree data structure with a simple heuristic.

Authors:  Huafeng Xu; Dimitris K Agrafiotis
Journal:  J Chem Inf Comput Sci       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec

3.  Finding more needles in the haystack: A simple and efficient method for improving high-throughput docking results.

Authors:  Anthony E Klon; Meir Glick; Mathis Thoma; Pierre Acklin; John W Davies
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2004-05-20       Impact factor: 7.446

4.  OptiDock: virtual HTS of combinatorial libraries by efficient sampling of binding modes in product space.

Authors:  Dennis G Sprous; David R Lowis; Joseph M Leonard; Trevor Heritage; Steven N Burkett; David S Baker; Robert D Clark
Journal:  J Comb Chem       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug

5.  Combination of a naive Bayes classifier with consensus scoring improves enrichment of high-throughput docking results.

Authors:  Anthony E Klon; Meir Glick; John W Davies
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2004-08-26       Impact factor: 7.446

6.  Comparative evaluation of eight docking tools for docking and virtual screening accuracy.

Authors:  Esther Kellenberger; Jordi Rodrigo; Pascal Muller; Didier Rognan
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2004-11-01

7.  [Molecular orbital calculations for the structure of the muscarine-pharmacophore].

Authors:  H D Höltje
Journal:  Arch Pharm (Weinheim)       Date:  1974-12       Impact factor: 3.751

8.  A geometric approach to macromolecule-ligand interactions.

Authors:  I D Kuntz; J M Blaney; S J Oatley; R Langridge; T E Ferrin
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1982-10-25       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  Structure-activity relationships for a large diverse set of natural, synthetic, and environmental estrogens.

Authors:  H Fang; W Tong; L M Shi; R Blair; R Perkins; W Branham; B S Hass; Q Xie; S L Dial; C L Moland; D M Sheehan
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.739

10.  Influenza virus neuraminidase inhibitors: generation and comparison of structure-based and common feature pharmacophore hypotheses and their application in virtual screening.

Authors:  Theodora Steindl; Thierry Langer
Journal:  J Chem Inf Comput Sci       Date:  2004 Sep-Oct
View more
  2 in total

1.  Identifying novel molecular structures for advanced melanoma by ligand-based virtual screening.

Authors:  Zhao Wang; Yan Lu; William Seibel; Duane D Miller; Wei Li
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.956

2.  SEABED: Small molEcule activity scanner weB servicE baseD.

Authors:  Carlos Fenollosa; Marcel Otón; Pau Andrio; Jorge Cortés; Modesto Orozco; J Ramon Goñi
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-10-27       Impact factor: 6.937

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.