Literature DB >> 16292571

Path integration: is there a difference between athletes and non-athletes?

Jonathan Bredin1, Yves Kerlirzin, Isabelle Israël.   

Abstract

The ability to estimate distance walked when blindfolded is associated with the vestibular, proprioceptive and (loco-)motor systems. In this study, we examined subjects' ability to walk when blindfolded to a previously seen target. We examined whether there is a difference of performance in path integration between athletes and non-athletes. Two groups of healthy volunteers took part in this experiment: 21 athletes and 20 non-athletes. Subjects were asked to walk at three different velocities (slow, normal, fast) to a target (10 m in front of them) that they had seen before being blindfolded. Increase in velocity was associated with a decrease in the distance walked for both groups. Both groups were accurate at normal velocities. Athletes were also accurate at fast velocities whereas non-athletes undershot the target. In both groups, accuracy considerably decreased at slow velocities. It seems that our perceptual system can adapt to different velocities (normal, fast) but is most strongly disrupted at low velocity. When attempting to modify walking velocity, step length is also modified, playing a determining role in the estimation of distance.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16292571     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-005-0251-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  16 in total

1.  Idiothetic navigation in humans: estimation of path length.

Authors:  M L Mittelstaedt; H Mittelstaedt
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Interaction of visual and idiothetic information in a path completion task.

Authors:  Daniele Nico; Isabelle Israël; Alain Berthoz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-08-22       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The influence of walking speed and prior practice on locomotor distance estimation.

Authors:  D Elliott
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 1.328

4.  Multifactorial interactions involved in linear self-transport distance estimate: a place for time.

Authors:  I Israël; A Capelli; D Sablé; C Laurent; C Lecoq; J Bredin
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.997

5.  Visual perception and the guidance of locomotion without vision to previously seen targets.

Authors:  J J Rieser; D H Ashmead; C R Talor; G A Youngquist
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.490

6.  Cognitive maps in rats and men.

Authors:  E C TOLMAN
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1948-07       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Continuous visual information may be important after all: a failure to replicate Thomson (1983).

Authors:  D Elliott
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Goal-directed linear locomotion in normal and labyrinthine-defective subjects.

Authors:  S Glasauer; M A Amorim; E Vitte; A Berthoz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Locomotor estimation of distance after visual scanning by children and adults.

Authors:  J T Corlett; A E Patla; J G Williams
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.490

10.  Haptic perception of the distance walked when blindfolded.

Authors:  M Schwartz
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  9 in total

1.  Going the distance: spatial scale of athletic experience affects the accuracy of path integration.

Authors:  Alastair D Smith; Christina J Howard; Niall Alcock; Kirsten Cater
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-08-24       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Walking speed and vestibular disorders in a path integration task.

Authors:  Helen S Cohen; Haleh Sangi-Haghpeykar
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2010-12-04       Impact factor: 2.840

3.  Humans do not have direct access to retinal flow during walking.

Authors:  Jan L Souman; Tom C A Freeman; Verena Eikmeier; Marc O Ernst
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  The development of path integration: combining estimations of distance and heading.

Authors:  Alastair D Smith; Laura McKeith; Christina J Howard
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Path integration: effect of curved path complexity and sensory system on blindfolded walking.

Authors:  Panagiotis Koutakis; Mukul Mukherjee; Srikant Vallabhajosula; Daniel J Blanke; Nicholas Stergiou
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 2.840

6.  Different performances in static and dynamic imagery and real locomotion. An exploratory trial.

Authors:  Augusto Fusco; Marco Iosa; Maria Chiara Gallotta; Stefano Paolucci; Carlo Baldari; Laura Guidetti
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Influence of the Size of the Field of View on Visual Perception While Running in a Treadmill-Mediated Virtual Environment.

Authors:  Martina Caramenti; Paolo Pretto; Claudio L Lafortuna; Jean-Pierre Bresciani; Amandine Dubois
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-10-16

8.  The practice of speleology: What is its relationship with spatial abilities?

Authors:  Veronica Muffato; Michela Zavagnin; Chiara Meneghetti
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2022-01-31

9.  Expert performance by athletes in the verbal estimation of spatial extents does not alter their perceptual metric of space.

Authors:  Frank H Durgin; Keenan Leonard-Solis; Owen Masters; Brittany Schmelz; Zhi Li
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2012
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.