Literature DB >> 16290

Chromosome distribution: experiments on cell hybrids and in vitro.

R B Nicklas.   

Abstract

Ostergren (1951) provided a simple explanation for both chromosome distribution in mitosis and chromosome segregation in meiosis, and more recently a molecular extension of his hypothesis has been possible. This report focuses on experimental tests of these ideas. Micromanipulation experiments on cell hybrids containing both meiotic and mitotic spindles demonstrate that differences in meiotic and mitotic chromosome behavior are determined by something intrinsic to the chromosome: meiotic chromosomes transferred to a mitotic spindle (or vice versa) behave just as they normally would. The molecular explanation postulates polarized growth or binding of microtubules at kinetochores. This has just been tested in vitro by McGill & Brinkley (1975) and by Telzer, Moses & Rosenbaum (1975), and their results are reviewed. In addition, a novel method for in vitro studies is described - mechanical demembranation of cells which is compatible with quite normal chromosome movement in anaphase. After addition of microtubule subunits to a demembranated prophase cell, chromosome orientation and movement toward an aster was observed for the first time in vitro. It is concluded that important aspects of chromosome distribution are probably understood at both the cellular and molecular levels, but final tests are still required. The outlook is hopeful indeed because the gaps in our knowledge are well known - the necessity of observations on prophase is a recurrent theme - and the means of filling the gaps are in hand.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1977        PMID: 16290     DOI: 10.1098/rstb.1977.0017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  28 in total

1.  The Saccharomyces cerevisiae centromere protein Slk19p is required for two successive divisions during meiosis.

Authors:  X Zeng; W S Saunders
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Rec8 cleavage by separase is required for meiotic nuclear divisions in fission yeast.

Authors:  Tomoya S Kitajima; Yousuke Miyazaki; Masayuki Yamamoto; Yoshinori Watanabe
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2003-10-15       Impact factor: 11.598

3.  Induced chromosomal exchange directs the segregation of recombinant chromatids in mitosis of Drosophila.

Authors:  K J Beumer; S Pimpinelli; K G Golic
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  "Bouquet arrest", monopolar chromosomes segregation, and correction of the abnormal spindle.

Authors:  Nataliya V Shamina
Journal:  Protoplasma       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 3.356

5.  Meiotic segregation, recombination, and gamete aneuploidy assessed in a t(1;10)(p22.1;q22.3) reciprocal translocation carrier by three- and four-probe multicolor FISH in sperm.

Authors:  P Van Hummelen; D Manchester; X Lowe; A J Wyrobek
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 6.  Meiosis: how could it work?

Authors:  N Kleckner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-08-06       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Centromeric dots in crane-fly spermatocytes: meiotic maturation and malorientation.

Authors:  M A Janicke; J R LaFountain
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.316

8.  Micromanipulation of Chromosomes in Insect Spermatocytes.

Authors:  Nicolas K H Lin; Ryder Nance; Jane Szybist; Alan Cheville; Leocadia V Paliulis
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 1.355

9.  Meiotic studies in human semen. Report of 180 cases.

Authors:  C Templado; S Marina; M D Coll; J Egozcue
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 4.132

10.  An analysis of spindle ultrastructure during prometaphase and metaphase of micronuclear division in Tetrahymena.

Authors:  J R LaFountain; L A Davidson
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 4.316

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.