Literature DB >> 16289987

Side-to-side differences in cortical bone mineral density of tibiae in young male athletes.

Teruki Sone1, Yoshiyuki Imai, Yong-In Joo, Sho Onodera, Tatsushi Tomomitsu, Masao Fukunaga.   

Abstract

The importance of physical activity in the development and maintenance of bone mineral density (BMD) is widely accepted. However, the effects on cortical BMD have not been clarified in detail. The present study examined bilateral asymmetries in cortical BMD of the tibia using peripheral quantitative computed tomography. Subjects comprised 37 young male athletes and 57 controls (age range, 18-28 years). BMD and geometrical indices were determined in bilateral tibiae. Cortical and trabecular BMD were calculated at the diaphysis and distal metaphysis, respectively. Cortical width, periosteal cross-sectional area, and cross-sectional moment of inertia were calculated using tomographic data of the tibial diaphysis. In athletes, the non-dominant leg showed greater cortical BMD than the dominant leg (mean difference, 5.42%; P < 0.0001). Cortical width and moment of inertia were also greater in the non-dominant leg. Periosteal area displayed no significant difference between legs. The control group exhibited similar results except for cortical BMD. No differences in trabecular BMD were noted between legs in either athletes or controls. These results implies the existence of mechanisms for the mechanical adaptation of cortical BMD. Dominant leg is used for mobility or manipulation whereas the non-dominant leg contributes to support the actions of the dominant leg. Loading differences in bilateral legs in young athletes might affect the remodeling rate leading to the side-to-side differences in cortical BMD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16289987     DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2005.10.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  3 in total

1.  Impaired geometric properties of tibia in older women with hip fracture history.

Authors:  T Mikkola; S Sipilä; E Portegijs; M Kallinen; M Alén; I Kiviranta; M Pekkonen; A Heinonen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-02-24       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  The Lichfield bone study: the skeletal response to exercise in healthy young men.

Authors:  Kyriacos I Eleftheriou; Jaikirty S Rawal; Anthony Kehoe; Laurence E James; John R Payne; James R Skipworth; Zudin A Puthucheary; Fotios Drenos; Dudley J Pennell; Mike Loosemore; Michael World; Steve E Humphries; Fares S Haddad; Hugh E Montgomery
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2011-11-23

3.  Sex differences in bone density, geometry, and bone strength of competitive soccer players.

Authors:  Breanne S Baker; Zhaojing Chen; Rebecca D Larson; Michael G Bemben; Debra A Bemben
Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 2.041

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.