Literature DB >> 16289272

Visual mismatch negativity elicited by magnocellular system activation.

J Kremlácek1, M Kuba, Z Kubová, J Langrová.   

Abstract

The processing of visual motion was tested by means of event related potentials recording (ERP) using a paradigm designed to produce a visual mismatch negativity effect. The stimuli were unattended and presented in the peripheral visual field (outside the central 15 degrees). The standard stimulus consisted of an up/down motion sequence, whilst the deviant stimulus of a down/up motion sequence. Significant ERP differences between the standard and deviant conditions were found in 8 out of 10 adult subjects already in 80 ms and prevailingly in interval 145-260 ms from the initial stimulus presentation. The results demonstrate that the magnocellular information undergoes processing capable of detecting differences in the sequence of unattended peripheral motion stimuli.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16289272     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2005.10.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  13 in total

Review 1.  A primer on motion visual evoked potentials.

Authors:  Sven P Heinrich
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-02-16       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Within-session reproducibility of motion-onset VEPs: effect of adaptation/habituation or fatigue on N2 peak amplitude and latency.

Authors:  Jan Kremlácek; Miroslav Kuba; Zuzana Kubová; Jana Langrová; Frantisek Vít; Jana Szanyi
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-05-31       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  Can illusory deviant stimuli be used as attentional distractors to record vMMN in a passive three stimulus oddball paradigm?

Authors:  Maria Flynn; Alki Liasis; Mark Gardner; Stewart Boyd; Tony Towell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-06-24       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Diminished parietal cortex activity associated with poor motion direction discrimination performance in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Jun Wang; Ryan Brown; Karen R Dobkins; Jennifer E McDowell; Brett A Clementz
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2009-11-13       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  fMRI investigation of visual change detection in adults with autism.

Authors:  H Clery; F Andersson; F Bonnet-Brilhault; A Philippe; B Wicker; M Gomot
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 4.881

6.  Visual mismatch negativity in the dorsal stream is independent of concurrent visual task difficulty.

Authors:  Jan Kremláček; Miroslav Kuba; Zuzana Kubová; Jana Langrová; Jana Szanyi; František Vít; Michal Bednář
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-30       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 7.  Visual mismatch negativity: a predictive coding view.

Authors:  Gábor Stefanics; Jan Kremláček; István Czigler
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Electrophysiological evidence of atypical visual change detection in adults with autism.

Authors:  H Cléry; S Roux; E Houy-Durand; F Bonnet-Brilhault; N Bruneau; M Gomot
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Unattended and attended visual change detection of motion as indexed by event-related potentials and its behavioral correlates.

Authors:  Nele Kuldkepp; Kairi Kreegipuu; Aire Raidvee; Risto Näätänen; Jüri Allik
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  vMMN for schematic faces: automatic detection of change in emotional expression.

Authors:  Kairi Kreegipuu; Nele Kuldkepp; Oliver Sibolt; Mai Toom; Jüri Allik; Risto Näätänen
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.