Literature DB >> 1628906

Cost-effectiveness of misoprostol in Sweden.

B Jönsson1, U Haglund.   

Abstract

Based on an American multicenter study, an economic evaluation of prophylactic misoprostol was undertaken in Sweden. The study included 420 patients with osteoarthritis and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)-associated abdominal pain, but no gastric ulcer at inclusion. The frequency of ulcer development with and without prophylactic misoprostol was assessed at 21.7% and 5.6%, respectively, for a 3-month period. All costs for drugs, ambulatory care, hospital care, loss of production, as well as other factors such as dosage and compliance, were transferred to Swedish conditions. It was concluded that in patients with osteoarthritis and NSAID-induced abdominal pain, prophylaxis with misoprostol is cost-effective in Sweden, which is similar to what is found for other countries. A prerequisite for this result is a frequency of ulcer development of 15%. A patient compliance to prophylactic treatment of more than 60% is also presupposed (79% was observed in the above study). Due to the high age of the osteoarthritis patient population, the cost-effectiveness is influenced to only a minor extent by whether indirect costs are included in the calculation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1628906     DOI: 10.1017/s0266462300013465

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care        ISSN: 0266-4623            Impact factor:   2.188


  18 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review of the cost effectiveness of prophylactic treatments in the prevention of gastropathy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis or osteoarthritis taking non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

Authors:  H E van Dieten; I B Korthals-de Bos; M W van Tulder; W F Lems; B A Dijkmans; M Boers
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 19.103

2.  Indirect costs in economic studies: confronting the confusion.

Authors:  M A Koopmanschap; F F Rutten
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 3.  Preventing NSAID-induced gastrointestinal toxicity. Economic considerations, methodological problems and results.

Authors:  G de Pouvourville
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 4.  NSAID-induced gastrointestinal damage. Epidemiology, risk and prevention, with an evaluation of the role of misoprostol. An Asia-Pacific perspective and consensus.

Authors:  G D Champion; P H Feng; T Azuma; D E Caughey; K H Chan; S Kashiwazaki; H C Liu; A R Nasution; M Nobunaga; S Prichanond; T P Torralba; V Udom; D Utis; S R Wang; W S Wong; D J Yang; M C Yoo
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 5.  Misoprostol: pharmacoeconomics of its use as prophylaxis against gastroduodenal damage induced by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

Authors:  L B Barradell; R Whittington; P Benfield
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  The cost effectiveness of diclofenac plus misoprostol compared with diclofenac monotherapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  M J Al; B C Michel; F F Rutten
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 7.  Pharmacoeconomics of chronic nonmalignant pain.

Authors:  M J Zagari; P D Mazonson; W C Longton
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 8.  Diclofenac/misoprostol. Pharmacoeconomic implications of therapy.

Authors:  G L Plosker; H M Lamb
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.981

9.  Economic evaluation of etoricoxib versus non-selective NSAIDs in the treatment of osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis patients in the UK.

Authors:  Andrew Moore; Ceri Phillips; Elke Hunsche; James Pellissier; Simone Crespi
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 10.  Use of misoprostol in the elderly: is the expense justified?

Authors:  G Stucki; M Johannesson; M H Liang
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 3.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.