Literature DB >> 16286887

Hepatocellular carcinoma: interventional bridging to liver transplantation.

Andreas Lubienski1.   

Abstract

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common solid cancers worldwide with surgery being considered the treatment of choice. However, it is limited in view of the hepatic dysfunction and high recurrence rates associated with the disease. Liver transplantation offers the advantage of both, eradicating the tumor and treating the underlying liver disease and is the only chance for cure in patients suffering from HCC. Survival is known to reach 70% after 5 years and recurrent tumor can be found in less than 20% provided transplantation is restricted to patients with single tumors < or =5 cm or three nodules <3 cm (Milan criteria). However, donor organs are limited and the time on the transplant waiting list is up to 6 or 12 months in Europe and the United States with up to 30-40% dropouts per year. It has been demonstrated that patients with untreated HCC while on the waiting list longer than 6-10 months do not have any benefit in survival after liver transplantation. Interventional treatment options such as transarterial chemoembolization and percutaneous ablation techniques documented promising results concerning the reduction of dropouts from the waiting list and the potential risk for recurrent tumor. Mortality and morbidity were considerably low when radiological interventions had been considered as bridging therapies for liver transplantation. Percutaneous therapies come along with tumoral seeding of 0.1% to 0.6%. Adjuvant treatment with TACE, PEI, and/ or RFA in T1- and T2-staged HCC resulted in tumor-free survival after transplantation of 95.2% after 4 years and intention-to-treat survival of 94%, 85%, and 79% at 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively. Aggressive ablation therapy with a short transplant waiting time has the potential to optimize the use of liver transplantation for curative intent in selected cirrhotic HCC patients. Especially combined treatments seemed to play a key role in achieving complete tumor necrosis associated with improved disease-free survival after liver transplantation. In conclusion, no evidence based data exist in the literature supporting the efficacy of adjuvant interventional treatment modalities for HCC in patients awaiting liver transplantation. However, it has been shown that adjuvant (multimodal) interventional treatments seem a promising option for safe and effective bridging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16286887     DOI: 10.1097/01.tp.0000187109.69663.93

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  11 in total

1.  Transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Thuong G Van Ha
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 1.513

2.  Role of Hepatic Resection for HCC in the era of Transplantation; an Experience of Two Tertiary Egyptian Centers.

Authors:  Ahhmed Senbel; Youssef Elmahdy; Sameh Roshdy; Ashraf Khater; Fayez Shehatoo; Omar Farouk; Adel Fathi; Emad Hamed; Sherif Kotb; Adel Denwer
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-07-19

Review 3.  The management of hospitalized patients with cirrhosis: the Mount Sinai experience and a guide for hospitalists.

Authors:  Ponni V Perumalswami; Thomas D Schiano
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2011-03-18       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma as a bridge to liver transplantation.

Authors:  Derek A DuBay; Charbel Sandroussi; John R Kachura; Chia Sing Ho; J Robert Beecroft; Charles M Vollmer; Anand Ghanekar; Markus Guba; Mark S Cattral; Ian D McGilvray; David R Grant; Paul D Greig
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2010-11-08       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 5.  Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Sudeep Tanwar; Shahid A Khan; Vijay Paul Bob Grover; Catherine Gwilt; Belinda Smith; Ashley Brown
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-11-28       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Combined treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma with partial splenic embolization and transcatheter hepatic arterial chemoembolization.

Authors:  Jin-Hua Huang; Fei Gao; Yang-Kui Gu; Wen-Quan Li; Lian-Wei Lu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-12-28       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Predictive factors of tumor response to trans-catheter treatment in cirrhotic patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a multivariate analysis of pre-treatment findings.

Authors:  Roberto Miraglia; Giada Pietrosi; Luigi Maruzzelli; Ioannis Petridis; Settimo Caruso; Gianluca Marrone; Giuseppe Mamone; Giovanni Vizzini; Angelo Luca; Bruno Gridelli
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Efficacy of transcatheter embolization/chemoembolization (TAE/TACE) for the treatment of single hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Roberto Miraglia; Giada Pietrosi; Luigi Maruzzelli; Ioannis Petridis; Settimo Caruso; Gianluca Marrone; Giuseppe Mamone; Giovanni Vizzini; Angelo Luca; Bruno Gridelli
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-06-07       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Extended postinterventional tumor necrosis-implication for outcome in liver transplant patients with advanced HCC.

Authors:  Arno Kornberg; Ulrike Witt; Edouard Matevossian; Bernadett Küpper; Volker Assfalg; Alexander Drzezga; Norbert Hüser; Moritz Wildgruber; Helmut Friess
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Liver transplantation as curative approach for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: is it justified?

Authors:  Aiman Obed; Tung-Yu Tsui; Andreas A Schnitzbauer; Manal Obed; Hans J Schlitt; Heinz Becker; Thomas Lorf
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2007-11-28       Impact factor: 3.445

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.