Literature DB >> 16284640

Effects of 2 ankle fatigue models on the duration of postural stability dysfunction.

Kelly M Harkins1, Carl G Mattacola, Timothy L Uhl, Terry R Malone, Jean L McCrory.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Muscle fatigue is generally categorized in 2 ways: that caused by peripheral weakness (peripheral fatigue) and that caused by a progressive failure of voluntary neural drive (central fatigue). Numerous variables have been studied in conjunction with fatigue protocols, including postural stability, maximum voluntary contraction force, and reaction time. When torque recordings fall below 50% of a maximum voluntary contraction, the muscle is described as fatigued, but whether this value is a good indicator of fatigue has not been studied.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of 2 ankle musculature fatigue protocols (30% and 50%) on the duration of postural stability dysfunction.
DESIGN: To assess differences between the 30% and 50% fatigue protocols, we calculated a 1 between-groups factor (subjects) and 2 within-groups factors (fatigue, test) analysis of variance.
SETTING: E.J. Nutter Athletic Training Facility. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: Twenty subjects (10 men, 10 women; age = 21.15 +/- 2.23 years; height = 172.97 +/- 9.86 cm; mass = 70.62 +/- 14.60 kg) volunteered for this study. Subjects had no history of lower extremity injury, vestibular or balance disorders, functional ankle instability, or head injury in the past 6 months. INTERVENTION(S): On separate days, subjects performed isokinetic fatiguing contractions of the plantar flexors and dorsiflexors in a 30% protocol (70% decrease in strength) and a 50% protocol (50% decrease in strength). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Baseline and postfatigue postural stability scores were determined before and after the isokinetic fatiguing contractions. Plantar-flexion peak-torque measurements were obtained for the 2 fatiguing protocols. Three prefatigue and 12 postfatigue postural stability trials were recorded. Velocities for testing were 60 degrees /s for plantar flexion and 120 degrees /s for dorsiflexion.
RESULTS: Sway velocity was significantly greater when the ankle was fatigued to 30% (1.56 degrees /s) than in the 50% condition (1.36 degrees /s). For the 30% protocol, sway was significantly impaired when the pretest condition (1.19 degrees /s) was compared with posttest trial 1 (2.34 degrees /s), trial 2 (2.37 degrees /s), and trial 3 (1.71 degrees /s). For the 50% protocol, sway was significantly impaired when the pretest condition (1.27 degrees /s) was compared with posttest trial 1 (2.02 degrees /s).
CONCLUSIONS: The 30% fatigue protocol resulted in significantly longer impairment of postural stability than the 50% protocol. Because the 30% protocol resulted in a greater effect but was relatively short-lived (approximately 75 to 90 s), it is more useful for research purposes.

Entities:  

Year:  2005        PMID: 16284640      PMCID: PMC1250260     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Athl Train        ISSN: 1062-6050            Impact factor:   2.860


  28 in total

1.  Constant relationships between force, phosphate concentration, and pH in muscles with differential fatigability.

Authors:  M W Weiner; R S Moussavi; A J Baker; M D Boska; R G Miller
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 9.910

2.  Effect of orthotics on postural sway after fatigue of the plantar flexors and dorsiflexors.

Authors:  D T Ochsendorf; C G Mattacola; B L Arnold
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  Fatigue effects on body balance.

Authors:  A Nardone; J Tarantola; A Giordano; M Schieppati
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1997-08

4.  The force-velocity relationship of human adductor pollicis muscle during stretch and the effects of fatigue.

Authors:  C J Ruiter; W J Didden; D A Jones; A D Haan
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2000-08-01       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Central fatigue in sports and daily exercises. A magnetic stimulation study.

Authors:  J Höllge; M Kunkel; U Ziemann; F Tergau; R Geese; C D Reimers
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 3.118

6.  Comparison of the ankle, knee, hip, and trunk corrective action shown during single-leg stance on firm, foam, and multiaxial surfaces.

Authors:  Bryan L Riemann; Joseph B Myers; Scott M Lephart
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.966

7.  Quantitation of progressive muscle fatigue during dynamic leg exercise in humans.

Authors:  C S Fulco; S F Lewis; P N Frykman; R Boushel; S Smith; E A Harman; A Cymerman; K B Pandolf
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1995-12

Review 8.  Mechanisms of human muscle fatigue. Quantitating the contribution of metabolic factors and activation impairment.

Authors:  R G Miller; J A Kent-Braun; K R Sharma; M W Weiner
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.622

9.  Development and reversal of fatigue in human tibialis anterior.

Authors:  M B Reid; G J Grubwieser; D S Stokic; S M Koch; A A Leis
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 3.217

10.  Changes in force and intracellular metabolites during fatigue of human skeletal muscle.

Authors:  E B Cady; D A Jones; J Lynn; D J Newham
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  22 in total

1.  The Effects of Performance Fatigability on Postural Control and Rehabilitation in the Older Patient.

Authors:  Evan V Papa; Mahdi Hassan; Nicoleta Bugnariu
Journal:  Curr Geriatr Rep       Date:  2016-06-29

2.  The effects of acute arm crank ergometry and cycle ergometry on postural sway and attentional demands during quiet bipedal standing.

Authors:  Mathew Hill; Christopher Pereira; Chris Talbot; Sam Oxford; Mike Price
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Compensatory control between the legs in automatic postural responses to stance perturbations under single-leg fatigue.

Authors:  Carla Daniele Pacheco Rinaldin; Júlia Avila de Oliveira; Caroline Ribeiro de Souza; Eduardo Mendonça Scheeren; Daniel Boari Coelho; Luis Augusto Teixeira
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Stimulated and voluntary fatiguing contractions of quadriceps femoris similarly disturb postural control in the bipedal stance.

Authors:  Vincent Chaubet; Julien Maitre; Bruno Cormery; Thierry Paillard
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  The interaction between the location of lower extremity muscle fatigue and visual condition on unipedal postural stability.

Authors:  Manijeh Soleimanifar; Mahyar Salavati; Behnam Akhbari; Mojgan Moghadam
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  Effects of age and acute muscle fatigue on reactive postural control in healthy adults.

Authors:  Evan V Papa; K Bo Foreman; Leland E Dibble
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 2.063

7.  High-intensity running and plantar-flexor fatigability and plantar-pressure distribution in adolescent runners.

Authors:  François Fourchet; Luke Kelly; Cosmin Horobeanu; Heiko Loepelt; Redha Taiar; Grégoire Millet
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2014-12-22       Impact factor: 2.860

8.  Effects of knee and ankle muscle fatigue on postural control in the unipedal stance.

Authors:  Riadh Bizid; Eric Margnes; Yrieix François; Jean Louis Jully; Gerard Gonzalez; Philippe Dupui; Thierry Paillard
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2009-03-14       Impact factor: 3.078

9.  Recovery of upper extremity sensorimotor system acuity in baseball athletes after a throwing-fatigue protocol.

Authors:  Brady L Tripp; Eric M Yochem; Timothy L Uhl
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2007 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.860

10.  Return of postural control to baseline after anaerobic and aerobic exercise protocols.

Authors:  Zachary G Fox; Jason P Mihalik; J Troy Blackburn; Claudio L Battaglini; Kevin M Guskiewicz
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.