Literature DB >> 16283494

The right to withdraw consent to research on biobank samples.

Gert Helgesson1, Linus Johnsson.   

Abstract

Ethical guidelines commonly state that research subjects should have a right to withdraw consent to participate. According to the guidelines we have studied, this right applies also to research on biological samples. However, research conducted on human subjects themselves differs in important respects from research on biological samples. It is therefore not obvious that the same rights should be granted research participants in the two cases. This paper investigates arguments for and against granting a right to withdraw consent to research on biobank samples. We conclude that (1) there are no explicit arguments for such a right in the guidelines we have studied, (2) the arguments against such a right are inconclusive, (3) considerations of autonomy, privacy, personal integrity, and trust in medical research provide sufficient reasons for granting a right to withdraw consent to research on biobank samples, (4) in certain cases, research participants should be allowed to waive this right.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Analytical Approach; Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Genetics and Reproduction

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16283494     DOI: 10.1007/s11019-005-0397-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Health Care Philos        ISSN: 1386-7423


  3 in total

1.  What research with stored samples teaches us about research with human subjects.

Authors:  David Wendler
Journal:  Bioethics       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 1.898

2.  Dignity is a useless concept.

Authors:  Ruth Macklin
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-12-20

3.  Convention for the protection of human rights and dignity of the human being with regard to the application of biology and medicine: convention on human rights and biomedicine (adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 19 November 1996). Council of Europe Convention of Biomedicine.

Authors: 
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 6.918

  3 in total
  10 in total

1.  Withdrawing from research: a rethink in the context of research biobanks.

Authors:  Søren Holm
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2011-09

2.  Withdrawal from biobank research: considerations and the way forward.

Authors:  Kristina Hug; Göran Hermerén; Mats Johansson
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 5.739

3.  The use of human tissue in epidemiological research; ethical and legal considerations in two biobanks in Belgium.

Authors:  Carla Truyers; Eliane Kellen; Marc Arbyn; Leen Trommelmans; Herman Nys; Karen Hensen; Bert Aertgeerts; Stefaan Bartholomeeusen; Mats Hansson; Frank Buntinx
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2010-05

4.  Comparison of participant information and informed consent forms of five European studies in genetic isolated populations.

Authors:  Deborah Mascalzoni; A Cecile J W Janssens; Alison Stewart; Peter Pramstaller; Ulf Gyllensten; Igor Rudan; Cornelia M van Duijn; James F Wilson; Harry Campbell; Ruth M C Quillan
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 5.  Genome privacy: challenges, technical approaches to mitigate risk, and ethical considerations in the United States.

Authors:  Shuang Wang; Xiaoqian Jiang; Siddharth Singh; Rebecca Marmor; Luca Bonomi; Dov Fox; Michelle Dow; Lucila Ohno-Machado
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 5.691

Review 6.  Ethical aspects of human biobanks: a systematic review.

Authors:  Danijela Budimir; Ozren Polasek; Ana Marusić; Ivana Kolcić; Tatijana Zemunik; Vesna Boraska; Ana Jeroncić; Mladen Boban; Harry Campbell; Igor Rudan
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.351

Review 7.  Human infection challenge studies in endemic settings and/or low-income and middle-income countries: key points of ethical consensus and controversy.

Authors:  Euzebiusz Jamrozik; Michael J Selgelid
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 2.903

8.  What Egyptians think. Knowledge, attitude, and opinions of Egyptian patients towards biobanking issues.

Authors:  Ahmed S Abdelhafiz; Eman A Sultan; Hany H Ziady; Ebtesam Ahmed; Walaa A Khairy; Douaa M Sayed; Rana Zaki; Merhan A Fouda; Rania M Labib
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 2.652

9.  Cancer patient perceptions on the ethical and legal issues related to biobanking.

Authors:  Zubin Master; Jaime O Claudio; Christen Rachul; Jean C Y Wang; Mark D Minden; Timothy Caulfield
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2013-03-08       Impact factor: 3.063

10.  The evolution of withdrawal: negotiating research relationships in biobanking.

Authors:  Karen Melham; Linda Briceno Moraia; Colin Mitchell; Michael Morrison; Harriet Teare; Jane Kaye
Journal:  Life Sci Soc Policy       Date:  2014-10-05
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.