Literature DB >> 12061383

What research with stored samples teaches us about research with human subjects.

David Wendler1.   

Abstract

There is widespread discussion concerning the safeguards appropriate for human research subjects. Less discussed is the fact that the safeguards one deems appropriate depend, in large part, on the model of research participation that one assumes. Therefore, to determine what safeguards are appropriate, it is necessary first to clarify the competing models of research participation. The ostensibly obscure debate over informed consent for research on stored biological samples is of particular interest in this regard because such research can involve varying subsets of the three central elements of research involvement. As a result, analysis of this debate provides an opportunity to identify the competing models of research participation. Based on this analysis, this paper describes a new model of research participation that is emerging, and considers its implications for clinical research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Analytical Approach; Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Genetics and Reproduction; Philosophical Approach

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12061383     DOI: 10.1111/1467-8519.00266

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioethics        ISSN: 0269-9702            Impact factor:   1.898


  5 in total

1.  Bioethics considerations for medical research in human archive tissues: the point of view of the researcher.

Authors:  Giorgio Stanta; Alberto Cescato; Serena Bonin; Renzo Barbazza
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2008-06-13       Impact factor: 4.064

2.  How anonymous is 'anonymous'? Some suggestions towards a coherent universal coding system for genetic samples.

Authors:  Harald Schmidt; Shawneequa Callier
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  The right to withdraw consent to research on biobank samples.

Authors:  Gert Helgesson; Linus Johnsson
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2005

4.  Broad versus blanket consent for research with human biological samples.

Authors:  David Wendler
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  2013 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.683

5.  Patients' views on identifiability of samples and informed consent for genetic research.

Authors:  Sara Chandros Hull; Richard R Sharp; Jeffrey R Botkin; Mark Brown; Mark Hughes; Jeremy Sugarman; Debra Schwinn; Pamela Sankar; Dragana Bolcic-Jankovic; Brian R Clarridge; Benjamin S Wilfond
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 11.229

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.