Literature DB >> 16283374

Stability and motor adaptation in human arm movements.

E Burdet1, K P Tee, I Mareels, T E Milner, C M Chew, D W Franklin, R Osu, M Kawato.   

Abstract

In control, stability captures the reproducibility of motions and the robustness to environmental and internal perturbations. This paper examines how stability can be evaluated in human movements, and possible mechanisms by which humans ensure stability. First, a measure of stability is introduced, which is simple to apply to human movements and corresponds to Lyapunov exponents. Its application to real data shows that it is able to distinguish effectively between stable and unstable dynamics. A computational model is then used to investigate stability in human arm movements, which takes into account motor output variability and computes the force to perform a task according to an inverse dynamics model. Simulation results suggest that even a large time delay does not affect movement stability as long as the reflex feedback is small relative to muscle elasticity. Simulations are also used to demonstrate that existing learning schemes, using a monotonic antisymmetric update law, cannot compensate for unstable dynamics. An impedance compensation algorithm is introduced to learn unstable dynamics, which produces similar adaptation responses to those found in experiments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16283374     DOI: 10.1007/s00422-005-0025-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Cybern        ISSN: 0340-1200            Impact factor:   2.086


  23 in total

1.  Adaptation to sensory-motor reflex perturbations is blind to the source of errors.

Authors:  Todd E Hudson; Michael S Landy
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Motor adaptation to a small force field superimposed on a large background force.

Authors:  Jiayin Liu; David J Reinkensmeyer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-11-08       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Dynamics model for analyzing reaching movements during active and passive torso rotation.

Authors:  Simone B Bortolami; Pascale Pigeon; Paul Dizio; James R Lackner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-03-11       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Transfer of dynamic motor skills acquired during isometric training to free motion.

Authors:  Alejandro Melendez-Calderon; Michael Tan; Moria Fisher Bittmann; Etienne Burdet; James L Patton
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Torque response to external perturbation during unconstrained goal-directed arm movements.

Authors:  Lei Zhang; Andreas Straube; Thomas Eggert
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Using noise to shape motor learning.

Authors:  Elias B Thorp; Konrad P Kording; Ferdinando A Mussa-Ivaldi
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  A computational model of limb impedance control based on principles of internal model uncertainty.

Authors:  Djordje Mitrovic; Stefan Klanke; Rieko Osu; Mitsuo Kawato; Sethu Vijayakumar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Sensorimotor control of contact force.

Authors:  John F Soechting; Martha Flanders
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2008-12-08       Impact factor: 6.627

9.  Children's head movements and postural stability as a function of task.

Authors:  Ian Flatters; Faisal Mushtaq; Liam J B Hill; Anna Rossiter; Kate Jarrett-Peet; Pete Culmer; Ray Holt; Richard M Wilkie; Mark Mon-Williams
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  A fresh perspective on dissecting action into discrete submotions.

Authors:  Justin Horowitz; Yazan Abdel Majeed; James Patton
Journal:  Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2016-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.